Evaluation of eHealth Deployment at Primary Care in the EU Member States by Usage of Selected MCDM Methods

被引:7
作者
Ardielli, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Dept Publ Econ, Sokolska 33, Ostrava, Czech Republic
关键词
eHealth; European Union; EU countries; Evaluation; MCDM; HEALTH INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; EUROPEAN-UNION; SYSTEMS; IMPLEMENTATION; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2478/revecp-2020-0016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Information and Communication Technologies have become a revolutionary part of European healthcare in recent years. The European Commission considers eHealth as an important and appropriate tool that can contribute to cope with the challenges that are currently affecting the healthcare systems in Europe. The development of eHealth is therefore embedded in many EU strategies and is being evaluated on an ongoing basis. In the past, several studies have been carried out focusing on the evaluation of individual areas of eHealth - especially on the area of primary care secured by General Practitioners and Acute Hospitals. However, no synthesis of these works was made. This paper is focused on the proposing of an assessment for both mentioned areas of eHealth. The aim is to evaluate the eHealth deployment in the European Union Member States by the synthesis of Composite Indicators in existing studies into the evaluation model based on the application of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making techniques. The evaluation is performed by the usage of TOPSIS, WSA, and MAPPAC method. The result of the research is the design of an evaluation framework for eHealth that enables the comparison of eHealth indicators in the international context and evaluation of eHealth deployment in European Union Member States in the form of a ranking In this ranking, the Nordic countries are among the best-rated countries, while the worst-rated countries are in Eastern Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 359
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Abu-Shanab E., 2014, INT J EMERGING SCI, V4, P207
[2]  
ADEBESIN F., 2013, P HISA 2013 C, P1
[3]   5G-Based Smart Healthcare Network: Architecture, Taxonomy, Challenges and Future Research Directions [J].
Ahad, Abdul ;
Tahir, Mohammad ;
Yau, Kok-Lim Alvin .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :100747-100762
[4]  
Alshehri M., 2010, International Association for Scientific Knowledge (IASK), P79
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ATT IMP DIG AUT DAIL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, POLITYKA INSIGHT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J GLOBAL INFORM MANA
[9]   Use of TOPSIS Method for Assessing of Good Governance in European Union Countries [J].
Ardielli, Eva .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 19 (03) :211-231
[10]  
ATUN R., 2004, WHAT ARE THE ADVANTA