Support surface related changes in feedforward and feedback control of standing posture

被引:27
作者
Mohapatra, Sambit [1 ]
Kukkar, Komal K. [1 ]
Aruin, Alexander S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Knecht Movement Sci Lab, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Postural control; Support surface; EMG; ELECTROMECHANICAL DELAY; MUSCLE MODES; ADJUSTMENTS; MOVEMENTS; RESPONSES; BALANCE; TRUNK; FOAM; EQUILIBRIUM; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.10.015
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of different support surfaces on feedforward and feedback components of postural control. Nine healthy subjects were exposed to external perturbations applied to their shoulders while standing on a rigid platform, foam, and wobble board with eyes open or closed. Electrical activity of nine trunk and leg muscles and displacements of the center of pressure were recorded and analyzed during the time frames typical of feedforward and feedback postural adjustments. Feedforward control of posture was characterized by earlier activation of anterior muscles when the subjects stood on foam compared to a wobble board or a firm surface. In addition, the magnitude of feedforward muscle activity was the largest when the foam was used. During the feedback control, anterior muscles were activated prior to posterior muscles irrespective of the nature of surface. Moreover, the largest muscle activity was seen when the supporting surface was foam. Maximum CoP displacement occurred when subjects were standing on a rigid surface. Altering support surface affects both feedforward and feedback components of postural control. This information should be taken into consideration in planning rehabilitation interventions geared towards improvement of balance. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat [J].
Adkin, AL ;
Frank, JS ;
Carpenter, MG ;
Peysar, GW .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2000, 12 (02) :87-93
[2]  
Alexandrov AV, 2005, BIOL CYBERN, V93, P309, DOI [10.1007/s00422-005-0004-1, 10.1007/s00422-005-0004-l]
[3]   Differences between trunk sway characteristics on a foam support surface and on the Equitest® ankle-sway-referenced support surface [J].
Allum, JHJ ;
Zamani, F ;
Adkin, AL ;
Ernst, A .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2002, 16 (03) :264-270
[4]  
Aruin A., 1997, Motor Control, V2, P178
[5]   Anticipatory postural adjustments in conditions of postural instability [J].
Aruin, AS ;
Forrest, WR ;
Latash, ML .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 109 (04) :350-359
[6]  
ARUIN AS, 1995, EXP BRAIN RES, V106, P291
[7]   Learning effects on muscle modes and multi-mode postural synergies [J].
Asaka, Tadayoshi ;
Wang, Yun ;
Fukushima, Junko ;
Latash, Mark L. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 184 (03) :323-338
[8]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHY-DYNAMIC GROSS-ANATOMY - A REVIEW [J].
BASMAJIAN, JV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1980, 159 (03) :245-260
[9]  
Behm D, 2012, INT J SPORTS PHYS TH, V7, P226
[10]  
BELEN'KII V. E., 1967, BIOFIZIKA, V12, P135