Performance and economic assessments of integrating geothermal energy into coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture

被引:26
作者
Wang, Fu [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Shuai [1 ]
Zhao, Jun [1 ]
Wang, Junyao [1 ]
Sun, Taiwei [1 ]
Yan, Jinyue [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Low & Medium Grade Ene, Minist Educ China, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Fac Maritime & Transportat, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Malardalen Univ, Sch Business Soc & Technol, SE-72123 Vastras, Sweden
[4] Royal Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
CO2; capture; Geothermal energy; Geothermal power plant; Renewable energy; Cost; CARBON CAPTURE; SOLAR-ENERGY; CHEMICAL ABSORPTION; GENERATION; CYCLE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.029
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
A novel carbon capture and storage system integrated with geothermal energy was proposed to reduce energy consumption in the post-combustion CO2 capture (PCC) process. Geothermal energy at medium temperature was used to provide the heat required for solvent regeneration. A technical and economic assessment was conducted based on a 300 MWe coal-fired power plant. Additionally, the integrated system was also compared with a stand-alone geothermal power (GP) plant to evaluate individual advantages. Both an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) and a hot sedimentary aquifer (HSA) reservoir were selected to identify the effect of geological properties and heat characteristics on system performance. The results indicated that the geothermal-assisted post-combustion CO2 capture (GPCC) plant exhibited better performance than the PCC plant. The net plant average efficiency increased 5.56% and 4.42% in the EGS scenario and HSA scenario, respectively. Furthermore, the net incremental geothermal efficiency obtained corresponded to 21.34% and 20.35% in the EGS scenario and HSA scenario, respectively. The economic assessment indicated that the GPCC systems in both the EGS scenario and HSA scenario had lower marginal cost of electricity (70.84 $/MWh and 101.06 SiMWh) when compared with that of the stand-alone GP systems (151.09 $/MWh and 101.95 SiMWh). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 287
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], IPCC SPECIAL REPORT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, CYCL TEMP REL 5 0
  • [3] [Anonymous], P 2011 AUSTR GEOTH E
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTU
  • [5] Thermo-economic analysis of a hybrid solar-binary geothermal power plant
    Ayub, Mohammad
    Mitsos, Alexander
    Ghasemi, Hadi
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 87 : 326 - 335
  • [6] Investigation of the effect of different refrigerants on performances of binary geothermal power plants
    Basaran, Anil
    Ozgener, Leyla
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 76 : 483 - 498
  • [7] Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics, 2012, AUSTR EN TECHN ASS C, P108
  • [8] Carbon Tax Center, CARB IS TAX
  • [9] Performance assessment of USC power plants integrated with CCS and concentrating solar collectors
    Cau, Giorgio
    Cocco, Daniele
    Tola, Vittorio
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 88 : 973 - 984
  • [10] Commodity Prices, COAL AUSTR THERM COA