The prohibition of online sports betting: a comparative analysis of Germany and the United States

被引:8
作者
Reiche, Danyel [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Polit Studies & Publ Adm PSPA, Beirut 11072020, Lebanon
关键词
sports betting; gambling; comparative politics; Germany; the USA; FOOTBALL;
D O I
10.1080/16184742.2012.741140
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines online sports betting in Germany and the USA, two countries that differ from the global trend that has been moving toward the legalization and liberalization of the sector. The following research questions are asked: Which joint factors led to the prohibition of online sports wagering in Germany and the USA? In what ways do the cases differ? After explaining the methodology of this research and conducting the case studies, the paper discusses the similarities and differences between the two countries, such as the official and unofficial reasons behind the bans, the administrative responsibilities of the issue, different policy instruments for implementing the bans, exceptions to the prohibition, the important role of courts in the debate, external pressure to change the respective national regulations, and the powerful role of sports governing associations that offer, in both cases, the main reasons for recent policy-making decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 314
页数:22
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Gambling Market and Individual Patterns of Gambling in Germany
    Albers N.
    Hübl L.
    [J]. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1997, 13 (2) : 125 - 144
  • [2] Albers N, 2008, GLUCKSSPIEL IN DEUTSCHLAND: OKONOMIE, RECHT, SUCHT, P56, DOI 10.1515/9783899495546.1.56
  • [3] Almond GabrielA., 2010, Comparative Politics Today: A World View
  • [4] American Gaming Association (AGA), 2011, SPORTS WAG
  • [5] [Anonymous], RUL 21 MISC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, ECONOMIST
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2008, COMP POLITICS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, New York Times.
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2011, SPORTW SOLL GEOFFN W
  • [10] [Anonymous], GREEN PAP ON LIN GAM