Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study

被引:236
作者
Weisz, Giora [1 ]
Metzger, D. Christopher [2 ]
Caputo, Ronald P. [3 ]
Delgado, Juan A. [4 ]
Marshall, J. Jeffrey [5 ]
Vetrovec, George W. [6 ]
Reisman, Mark [7 ]
Waksman, Ron [8 ]
Granada, Juan F. [4 ]
Novack, Victor [9 ]
Moses, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Carrozza, Joseph P. [10 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Intervent Vasc Therapy, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Wellmont Holston Valley, Kingsport, TN USA
[3] St Josephs Hosp, Syracuse, NY USA
[4] Corb Cardio Neurovasc Inst, Medellin, Colombia
[5] Northeast Georgia Heart Ctr, Gainesville, GA USA
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[7] Swedish Heart & Vasc Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[8] Washington Heart Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[9] Soroka Univ, Med Ctr, Clin Res Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
[10] St Elizabeths Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
关键词
angioplasty; robotic-enhanced PCI; stent; CARDIOLOGISTS; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety as well as the clinical and technical effectiveness of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention. Background Robotic systems have been suggested to enhance the performance of cardiovascular procedures, as well as to provide protection from the occupational hazards that are associated with interventional practice. Methods Patients with coronary artery disease and clinical indications for percutaneous intervention were enrolled. The coronary intervention was performed with the CorPath 200 robotic system, which consists of a remote interventional cockpit and a bedside disposable cassette that enables the operator to advance, retract, and rotate guidewires and catheters. The primary endpoints were clinical procedural success, defined as <30% residual stenosis at the completion of the robotic-assisted procedure without major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days, and device technical success, defined as the successful manipulation of the intracoronary devices using the robotic system only. Results A total of 164 patients were enrolled at 9 sites. Percutaneous coronary intervention was completed successfully without conversion to manual operation, and device technical success was achieved in 162 of 164 patients (98.8%). There were no device-related complications. Clinical procedural success was achieved in 160 of 164 patients (97.6%), whereas 4 (2.4%) had periprocedural non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. No deaths, strokes, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or revascularization occurred in the 30 days after the procedures. Radiation exposure for the primary operator was 95.2% lower than the levels found at the traditional table position. Conclusions This pivotal multicenter study with a robotic-enhanced coronary intervention system demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the system. The robotic remote-control procedure met the expected technical and clinical performance, with significantly lower radiation exposure to the operator. (Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the CorPath 200 System in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions [PCI] [ PRECISE]; NCT01275092) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1596-600) (c) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1596 / 1600
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Remote-control percutaneous coronary interventions - Concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial [J].
Beyar, R ;
Gruberg, L ;
Deleanu, D ;
Roguin, A ;
Almagor, Y ;
Cohen, S ;
Kumar, G ;
Wenderow, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (02) :296-300
[2]  
Beyar Rafael, 2005, EuroIntervention, V1, P340
[3]   Risk for Radiation-Induced Cataract for Staff in Interventional Cardiology: Is There Reason for Concern? [J].
Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera ;
Rehani, Madan M. ;
Sim, Kui Hian ;
Liew, Houng Bang ;
Vano, Eliseo ;
Kleiman, Norman J. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 76 (06) :826-834
[4]   Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: Prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice [J].
Goldstein, JA ;
Baiter, S ;
Cowley, M ;
Hodgson, J ;
Klein, LW .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (04) :407-411
[5]   First-in-Human Evaluation of a Novel Robotic-Assisted Coronary Angioplasty System [J].
Granada, Juan F. ;
Delgado, Juan A. ;
Uribe, Maria Paola ;
Fernandez, Andres ;
Blanco, Guillermo ;
Leon, Martin B. ;
Weisz, Giora .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (04) :460-465
[6]   ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures - A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training [J].
Hirshfeld, JW ;
Balter, S ;
Brinker, JA ;
Kern, MJ ;
Klein, LW ;
Lindsay, BD ;
Tommaso, CL ;
Tracy, CM ;
Wagner, LK ;
Creager, MA ;
Elnicki, M ;
Hirshfeld, JW ;
Lorell, BH ;
Rodgers, GP ;
Tracy, CM ;
Weitz, HH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (11) :2259-2282
[7]  
Kaluza G, 2011, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V57, pE1952
[8]   Occupational Health Hazards in the Interventional Laboratory: Time for a Safer Environment [J].
Klein, Lloyd W. ;
Miller, Donald L. ;
Balter, Stephen ;
Laskey, Warren ;
Haines, David ;
Norbash, Alexander ;
Mauro, Matthew A. ;
Goldstein, James A. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 73 (03) :432-438
[9]   New Recommendations for Occupational Radiation Protection [J].
Miller, Donald L. ;
Schueler, Beth A. ;
Balter, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 9 (05) :366-368
[10]  
Nikolsky Eugenia, 2007, J Invasive Cardiol, V19, P208