Patterns of Participation and Representation in a Regional Water Collaboration

被引:36
作者
Hui, Iris [1 ]
Ulibarri, Nicola [2 ]
Cain, Bruce [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Bill Lane Ctr Amer West, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Urban Planning & Publ Policy, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Humanities & Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Polit Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
regional collaboration; Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM); collaborative governance; text mining; Natural Language Processing; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; CONTEXT; INSTITUTIONS; HYDROPOWER; CALIFORNIA; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS; MINUTES; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/psj.12266
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Regional collaboration has become a popular means to manage shared resources and address cross-jurisdictional boundary issues. The question of who participates in the process, who directly affects decisions, and who benefits from those decisions is critical for understanding the broader value created by regional collaborations. We apply a variety of text mining techniques to meeting minutes to measure how stakeholder participation evolved over nine years of an Integrated Regional Water Management collaboration. We observe that a diverse set of organizations representing differing interests participated to some extent in the process. However, a minority of organizations attended regularly, while most attended sporadically and/or only attended outreach events. Verbs used to describe interaction varied across meeting types, displaying egalitarian patterns of interaction among participants in core leadership meetings and more one-way interaction among attendees of outreach meetings. We then estimate whether participation affects the likelihood of receiving funding through the IRWM program. Participants who attended the core group meetings most regularly were most likely to receive funding for their projects, suggesting that uneven patterns of participation matter for the substantive value created by the collaboration.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 781
页数:28
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: An institutional perspective [J].
Ananda, Jayanath ;
Proctor, Wendy .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 86 :97-106
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, POLICY STUD J, DOI DOI 10.1111/psj.12162
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CAMB STUD ELECT LAW
[4]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[5]  
Benson D, 2015, WATER ALTERN, V8, P756
[6]  
Blair R., 2013, STATE LOCAL GOVT REV, V45, P268, DOI 10.1177/0160323X13511647
[7]   Fragments of regionalism: The limits of Southern California governance [J].
Bollens, SA .
JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 1997, 19 (01) :105-122
[8]  
Brill Eric, 2000, HDB NATURAL LANGUAGE, P403
[9]   Coming to the table: collaborative governance and groundwater decision-making in coastal California [J].
Brown, Abigail ;
Langridge, Ruth ;
Rudestam, Kirsten .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (12) :2163-2178
[10]   Burning through organizational boundaries? Examining inter-organizational communication networks in policy-mandated collaborative bushfire planning groups [J].
Brummel, Rachel F. ;
Nelson, Kristen C. ;
Jakes, Pamela J. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (02) :516-528