Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Nuclear Size Features in Female Breast Cancer in Libya: Correlation with Clinical Features and Survival

被引:1
作者
Abdalla, Fathi B. Elmabrouk [2 ,4 ]
Markus, Rabia [5 ]
Buhmeida, Abdelbaset [1 ]
Boder, Jamela [2 ,4 ]
Syrjanen, Kari [3 ]
Collan, Yrjo [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, CEGMR, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[3] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiotherapy, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[4] Natl Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, Misurata, Libya
[5] Tripoli Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Tripoli, Libya
关键词
Estrogen receptor (ER); progesterone receptor (PR); hormonal receptor (HR); nuclear morphometry; survival; clinical features; histopathology; Libyan female breast carcinoma; HORMONE-RECEPTORS; RISK-FACTORS; MORPHOMETRY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; TAMOXIFEN; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The features of Libyan patients with breast cancer have not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression patterns of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), as well as nuclear morphometric features, in patients with breast cancer, and to correlate them with clinicopathological features and prognosis. Patients and Methods: Data for a total of 62 female Libyan patients with breast cancer, diagnosed between 2000 and 2006, were retrospectively studied. Their clinical and pathological data were collected and analysed. Immunohistochemical evaluation of ER and PR expression was also performed. Further more nuclear morphometry was carried out. Results: Of the 62 patients, disease in 10 was of the lobular type, 43 had invasive ductal and 9 had other carcinoma types; 47 out of 62 had lymph node involvement. Positive hormonal receptor expression was more common among those with lymph node-negative than lymph nodepositive tumours. ER- and PR-positive patients appeared to have a better survival than ER- and PR-negative patients. The most significant difference, with respect to survival, was found between those bearing tumors with completely negative hormonal staining (J score 0) and those with positive staining (J score 1, 2 and 3). Larger nuclear size was associated with lymph node involvement and high-grade tumours (p<0.01 and p<0.0001, respectively), with shorter survival, larger tumour size and higher stage. Conclusion: The cut-off points for defining the groups with good or worse prognosis might be set, between score 0 and 1 (corresponding to 1% or fewer positive cells). Patients with ER- and PR-positive cancer had better overall survival than patients with hormonal receptor-negative cancer. In our hospital setting, ER and PR expressions and mean nuclear area (MNA) in breast carcinoma may be prognostically useful markers in guiding future treatment in prospective studies.
引用
收藏
页码:3485 / 3493
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Prognostic Significance of Single Progesterone Receptor Positivity A Comparison Study of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive/Her2 Negative Primary Breast Cancer With Triple Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Fan, Ying ;
Ding, Xiaoyan ;
Xu, Binghe ;
Ma, Fei ;
Yuan, Peng ;
Wang, Jiayu ;
Zhang, Pin ;
Li, Qing ;
Luo, Yang .
MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (46) :e2066
[32]   Correlation between erythropoietin receptor(s) and estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in different breast cancer cell lines [J].
Trost, Nina ;
Hevir, Neli ;
Rizner, Tea Lanisnik ;
Debeljak, Natasa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2013, 31 (03) :717-725
[33]   The loss of estrogen and progesterone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer [J].
Lapidus, RG ;
Nass, SJ ;
Davidson, NE .
JOURNAL OF MAMMARY GLAND BIOLOGY AND NEOPLASIA, 1998, 3 (01) :85-94
[34]   Immunoexpression of claudin-4 and correlation with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-neu in breast cancer [J].
Kumar, Niranjan ;
Tandon, Megha ;
Chintamani, C. M. ;
Saxena, Sunita .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06) :1766-1770
[35]   Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) in breast cancer of Indian women [J].
Patil, Amit V. ;
Bhamre, Rahul S. ;
Singhai, Rajeev ;
Tayade, Mukund B. ;
Patil, Vinayak W. .
BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2011, 3 :27-33
[36]   Nuclear shape and orientation features from H&E images predict survival in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers [J].
Lu, Cheng ;
Romo-Bucheli, David ;
Wang, Xiangxue ;
Janowczyk, Andrew ;
Ganesan, Shridar ;
Gilmore, Hannah ;
Rimm, David ;
Madabhushi, Anant .
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 (11) :1438-1448
[37]   A prospective cohort study of clinical characteristics and outcomes in Chinese patients with estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive early breast cancer [J].
Fan, Yu ;
Zhong, Xiaorong ;
Wang, Yu ;
Wang, Zhu ;
Luo, Ting ;
Wang, Yanping ;
Zheng, Hong .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 200 (02) :171-182
[38]   Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from 68Ga-RGD PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT [J].
Yoon, Hai-Jeon ;
Kang, Keon Wook ;
Chun, In Kook ;
Cho, Nariya ;
Im, Seock-Ah ;
Jeong, Sunjoo ;
Lee, Song ;
Jung, Kyeong Cheon ;
Lee, Yun-Sang ;
Jeong, Jae Min ;
Lee, Dong Soo ;
Chung, June-Key ;
Moon, Woo Kyung .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 (08) :1534-1543
[39]   Correlation between microRNA-21, microRNA-206 and estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in breast cancer [J].
Chen, Yuanwen ;
Wu, Nian ;
Liu, Lei ;
Dong, Huaying ;
Wu, Chengyi .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 71 :52-57
[40]   Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer might no longer be classified as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer [J].
Zheng, Hongjuan ;
Ge, Chenyang ;
Lin, Haiping ;
Wu, Lunpo ;
Wang, Qinghua ;
Zhou, Shishi ;
Tang, Wanfen ;
Zhang, Xia ;
Jin, Xiayun ;
Xu, Xifeng ;
Hong, Zhongwu ;
Fu, Jianfei ;
Du, Jinlin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 27 (07) :1145-1153