Emergence and influence of a new policy regime: The case of forest carbon offsets in British Columbia

被引:15
作者
St-Laurent, Guillaume Peterson [1 ]
Hagerman, Shannon [2 ]
Hoberg, George [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Liu Inst Global Issues, 6476 NW Marine Dr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Dept Forest Resources Management, 2031-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
Forest carbon offsets; Policy change; Climate change mitigation; British columbia; Forest management; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; AFFORESTATION; CHALLENGES; EVOLUTION; IMPACTS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The most significant carbon mitigation policy currently targeting BC's forests is the Forest Carbon Offsets Protocol (FCOP) that outlines the rules regulating forest carbon offsets. By applying the Policy Regime Framework to the FCOP, this paper addresses the following specific questions: what is the extent of the policy change brought by FCOP, and what are the main factors that influenced and shaped this policy change? The paper concludes that policy did change: an offset regime was established and FCOP was adopted to steer the development of forest carbon offsets. It is the executive branch of government, and especially Premier Gordon Campbell, that was most influential during problem definition and the decision making around forest carbon offset policy. In addition, environmentalists and First Nations, by advocating for a conservation economy, and the private sector, by lobbying the government to prioritize their economic interests, also influenced the policy making process. However, the actual magnitude of policy change that occurred with the emergence of the forest carbon policy regime is quite limited. Apart from a few conservation and improved forest management projects that mostly benefited First Nations, very few projects have been successfully implemented to date. This limited policy change was caused by various economic, social and political limitations. In particular, the shift in government in 2011 that led to the decision not to implement a cap and trade program significantly reduced marketing opportunities for BC-based forest offsets. In addition, the negative public opinion towards the credibility and effectiveness of forest carbon offsets, the low international price of carbon, the high transaction costs and the lack of financing options strongly restrained their development. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:12
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [51] Challenges in the design of performance-based forestry regulations: Lessons from British Columbia
    Hoberg, George
    Malkinson, Leah
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 54 - 62
  • [52] HOEKSTRA G, 2013, AUDITOR GEN SLAMS BC
  • [53] Comparative Politics of Sub-Federal Cap-and-Trade: Implementing the Western Climate Initiative
    Houle, David
    Lachapelle, Erick
    Purdon, Mark
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2015, 15 (03) : 49 - 73
  • [54] Howlett M., 2001, Canadian forest policy: adapting to change
  • [55] Howlett M., 2003, STUDYING PUBLIC POLI, DOI DOI 10.2307/2952394
  • [56] Three approaches to qualitative content analysis
    Hsieh, HF
    Shannon, SE
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) : 1277 - 1288
  • [57] HUME M, 2013, HUGE MARKUP CARBON O
  • [58] HUME S, 2006, HARPER SHOULD THINK, pA15
  • [59] IPCC, 2022, Climate change 2022 Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009325844, 10.1017/9781009325844]
  • [60] KAMPER C, 2010, DRAFT FOREST CARBON