Emergence and influence of a new policy regime: The case of forest carbon offsets in British Columbia

被引:15
作者
St-Laurent, Guillaume Peterson [1 ]
Hagerman, Shannon [2 ]
Hoberg, George [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Liu Inst Global Issues, 6476 NW Marine Dr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Forestry, Dept Forest Resources Management, 2031-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
Forest carbon offsets; Policy change; Climate change mitigation; British columbia; Forest management; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; AFFORESTATION; CHALLENGES; EVOLUTION; IMPACTS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The most significant carbon mitigation policy currently targeting BC's forests is the Forest Carbon Offsets Protocol (FCOP) that outlines the rules regulating forest carbon offsets. By applying the Policy Regime Framework to the FCOP, this paper addresses the following specific questions: what is the extent of the policy change brought by FCOP, and what are the main factors that influenced and shaped this policy change? The paper concludes that policy did change: an offset regime was established and FCOP was adopted to steer the development of forest carbon offsets. It is the executive branch of government, and especially Premier Gordon Campbell, that was most influential during problem definition and the decision making around forest carbon offset policy. In addition, environmentalists and First Nations, by advocating for a conservation economy, and the private sector, by lobbying the government to prioritize their economic interests, also influenced the policy making process. However, the actual magnitude of policy change that occurred with the emergence of the forest carbon policy regime is quite limited. Apart from a few conservation and improved forest management projects that mostly benefited First Nations, very few projects have been successfully implemented to date. This limited policy change was caused by various economic, social and political limitations. In particular, the shift in government in 2011 that led to the decision not to implement a cap and trade program significantly reduced marketing opportunities for BC-based forest offsets. In addition, the negative public opinion towards the credibility and effectiveness of forest carbon offsets, the low international price of carbon, the high transaction costs and the lack of financing options strongly restrained their development. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:12
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Environmental Bargaining and Boundary Organizations: Remapping British Columbia's Great Bear Rainforest
    Affolderbach, Julia
    Clapp, Roger Alex
    Hayter, Roger
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2012, 102 (06) : 1391 - 1408
  • [2] The Evolution of Devolution: A Critical Analysis of the Community Forest Agreement in British Columbia
    Ambus, Lisa
    Hoberg, George
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2011, 24 (09) : 933 - 950
  • [3] [Anonymous], BRIT COL GREENH GAS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, History
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, POLICIES SUSTAINABLY
  • [6] [Anonymous], NAT RESOUR ENV
  • [7] *AUD GEN BC OFF, 2013, AUD CARB NEUTR GOV O
  • [8] Certification Schemes and the Impacts on Forests and Forestry
    Auld, Graeme
    Gulbrandsen, Lars H.
    McDermott, Constance L.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 (187-211) : 187 - 211
  • [9] BARRETT T, 2007, 1 NAT LEAD PREM CARB
  • [10] BAUMGARTNER FR, 2007, AGENDAS INSTABILITY