Quantifying co-benefit potentials in the Chinese cement sector during 12th Five Year Plan: an analysis based on marginal abatement cost with monetized environmental effect

被引:34
作者
Xi, Yang [1 ]
Fei, Teng [1 ]
Gehua, Wang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon mitigation; Co-benefit; Marginal abatement cost; Cement industry; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ANCILLARY BENEFITS; AIR-POLLUTION; EMISSIONS; INDUSTRY; URBANIZATION; BURDEN; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing urbanization in China has led to growing demands for better air quality and human welfare. Global warming and local pollutants, such as SO2, NOx and PMs are the two main issues during China's development. However, these two topics are always studied separately and the co-benefits of mitigation measures are always ignored. Therefore, the interaction between carbon mitigation and local pollutant reduction measures should receive more attention. This paper presents a case study of co-benefits in the cement sector, which is the main building materials sector during urbanization. Different with the ExternE methodology based on dose response functions, a simplified method built upon benefit transfer is introduced to evaluate the cobenefits of mitigation measures and their impact on marginal abatement cost during 12th Five Year Plan period (2011-2015). The result shows that the co-benefits of 18 main carbon mitigation technologies are significant when considering the environmental effect. The range of co-benefit varies from 3 RMB/tCO(2) to 267 RMB/tCO(2), with Co-control technologies in the upstream of the production chain have better co-benefits than downstream technologies, and energy conservation is the most critical issue in increasing co-benefits. Co-benefits should be integrated into project evaluation through various modes in order to promote the most cost-effective mitigation technologies. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 111
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Co-benefits of climate policy - lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China [J].
Aunan, K ;
Fang, JH ;
Vennemo, H ;
Oye, K ;
Seip, HM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (04) :567-581
[2]   Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry [J].
Benhelal, Emad ;
Zahedi, Gholamreza ;
Shamsaei, Ezzatollah ;
Bahadori, Alireza .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 51 :142-161
[3]  
Bickel P, 2005, RES TRANS E, V14, P185, DOI 10.1016/S0739-8859(05)14007-4
[4]   Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefit analysis [J].
Bollen, Johannes ;
van der Zwaan, Bob ;
Brink, Corjan ;
Eerens, Hans .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (03) :161-181
[5]   The environmental burden of disease in Canada: Respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and congenital affliction [J].
Boyd, David R. ;
Genuis, Stephen J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2008, 106 (02) :240-249
[6]   Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector [J].
Burtraw, D ;
Krupnick, A ;
Palmer, K ;
Paul, A ;
Toman, M ;
Bloyd, C .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (03) :650-673
[7]   Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation [J].
Chen, C. ;
Habert, G. ;
Bouzidi, Y. ;
Jullien, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (05) :478-485
[8]  
China Cement Industry Association, 2011, CHIN CEM ALM
[9]  
China's Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2011, CHIN STAT YB ENV
[10]   Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing [J].
Creutzig, Felix ;
He, Dongquan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (02) :120-131