Validation of the Saskatoon Falls Prevention Consortium's Falls Screening and Referral Algorithm

被引:12
作者
Lawson, Sara Nicole [1 ]
Zaluski, Neal [2 ]
Petrie, Amanda [3 ]
Arnold, Cathy [4 ]
Basran, Jenny [5 ]
Dal Bello-Haas, Vanina [6 ]
机构
[1] Shuya & Associates Integrat Sports Rehab & Wellne, Regina, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Craven SPORT Serv, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, North 49 Balance & Dizziness Ctr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Sch Phys Therapy, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada
[5] Saskatoon City Hosp, Geriatr Evaluat & Management Program, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
关键词
algorithms; aged; falls; accidental; reproducibility of results; risk assessment; OLDER-ADULTS; RISK-FACTORS; FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; ELDERLY PERSONS; COMMUNITY; BALANCE; PREDICT; INPATIENTS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3138/ptc.2011-17
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the concurrent validity of the Saskatoon Falls Prevention Consortium's Falls Screening and Referral Algorithm (FSRA). Method: A total of 29 older adults (mean age 77.7 [SD 4.0] y) residing in an independent-living senior's complex who met inclusion criteria completed a demographic questionnaire and the components of the FSRA and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The FSRA consists of the Elderly Fall Screening Test (EFST) and the Multi-factor Falls Questionnaire (MFQ); it is designed to categorize individuals into low, moderate, or high fall-risk categories to determine appropriate management pathways. A predictive model for probability of fall risk, based on previous research, was used to determine concurrent validity of the FSRI. Results: The FSRA placed 79% of participants into the low-risk category, whereas the predictive model found the probability of fall risk to range from 0.04 to 0.74, with a mean of 0.35 (SD 0.25). No statistically significant correlation was found between the FSRA and the predictive model for probability of fall risk (Spearman's p = 0.35, p = 0.06). Conclusion: The FSRA lacks concurrent validity relative to to a previously established model of fall risk and appears to over-categorize individuals into the low-risk group. Further research on the FSRA as an adequate tool to screen community-dwelling older adults for fall risk is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, REP SEM FALLS CAN DI
[2]  
BERG K, 1989, Physiotherapy Canada, V41, P304
[3]  
BERG KO, 1992, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V83, pS7
[4]  
BERG KO, 1992, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V73, P1073
[5]  
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), 2001, ONT TRAUM REG B COMP
[6]   Berg balance scale:: Intrarater test-retest reliability among older people dependent in activities of daily living and living in residential care facilities [J].
Conradsson, Mia ;
Lundin-Olsson, Lillernor ;
Lindeloef, Nina ;
Littbrand, Hakan ;
Malmqvist, Lisa ;
Gustafson, Yngve ;
Rosendahl, Erik .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 87 (09) :1155-1163
[7]   Validation of a fall-risk screening test, the Elderly Fall Screening Test (EFST), for community-dwelling elderly [J].
Cwikel, JG ;
Fried, AV ;
Biderman, A ;
Galinsky, D .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 20 (05) :161-167
[8]  
Domholdt E., 2005, Rehabilitation research: principles and applications, V3rd
[9]  
FLEMING KC, 1995, MAYO CLIN PROC, V70, P890
[10]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198