Promoter methylation of BRCA1 in the prognosis of breast cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:41
作者
Wu, Liang [1 ]
Wang, Fengliang [2 ]
Xu, Ruobing [1 ]
Zhang, Simin [1 ]
Peng, Xianzhen [1 ]
Feng, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Jianming [1 ]
Lu, Cheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Breast, Nanjing Matern & Child Hlth Hosp, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast cancer; BRCA1; Methylation; Prognosis; Survival; Meta-analysis; CELL-FREE DNA; PREDICTS SENSITIVITY; HYPERMETHYLATION; GENES; SERUM; INACTIVATION; CARCINOMAS; MORTALITY; REPAIR; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2774-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The inactivation of BRCA1 by epigenetic alterations is a critical event in breast tumorigenesis, which may potentially be used as a prognostic marker for patients with breast cancer. The present study systematically reviewed the promoter methylation of BRCA1 and its relationship to the clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients. We performed a meta-analysis following the PRISMA guideline. Relevant articles were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science and Embase database until August 2013. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were applied to estimate the effect of BRCA1 methylation. Random or fixed effect model was chosen based on the heterogeneity analysis. A total of 3,205 patients from nine eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. BRCA1 methylation was found to be significantly correlated with a poor overall survival of breast cancer, with the combined HR (95 % CI) of 2.02 (1.35-3.03). After adjusting for potential confounders using the Cox regression model, the pooled HR (95 % CI) of BRCA1 methylation on patients' overall survival was 1.38 (1.04-1.84). If we used the disease-free survival as the outcome, the combined HR (95 % CI) was 2.89 (1.73-4.83) for univariate analysis and 3.92 (95 % CI 1.49-10.32) for multivariate analysis, respectively. Subgroup analysis of specimen types revealed that the pooled HR (95 % CI) for overall survival was 1.48 (1.22-1.81) when using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen and 1.38 (0.16-11.84) when using fresh frozen tissues. As for the disease-free survival, the pooled HR (95 % CI) was 2.47 (1.33-4.58) when using FFPE specimen and 2.78 (1.47-5.28) when using fresh frozen tissues. As a conclusion, the present meta-analysis provides evidence that BRCA1 methylation is associated with a poor survival of breast cancer patients. Our findings underscore the clinical relevance of aberrant epigenetic alteration as a promising biomarker for the prognosis of human cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 627
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   More Than Numbers: The Power of Graphs in Meta-Analysis [J].
Bax, Leon ;
Ikeda, Noriaki ;
Fukui, Naohito ;
Yaju, Yukari ;
Tsuruta, Harukazu ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 169 (02) :249-255
[2]   Aberrant methylation of gene promoters in cancer - Concepts, misconcepts, and promise [J].
Baylin, SB ;
Belinsky, SA ;
Herman, JG .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (18) :1460-1461
[3]   Contribution of epigenetic alteration of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast carcinomas in Tunisian patients [J].
Ben Gacem, R. ;
Hachana, M. ;
Ziadi, S. ;
Amara, K. ;
Ksia, F. ;
Mokni, M. ;
Trimeche, M. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (02) :190-197
[4]   Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer [J].
Berry, DA ;
Cronin, KA ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Fryback, DG ;
Clarke, L ;
Zelen, M ;
Mandelblatt, JS ;
Yakovlev, AY ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Feuer, EJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1784-1792
[5]   BRCA1 promoter methylation associated with poor survival in Chinese patients with sporadic breast cancer [J].
Chen, Yanglin ;
Zhou, Jing ;
Xu, Ye ;
Li, Zhaosheng ;
Wen, Xianzi ;
Yao, Lihua ;
Xie, Yuntao ;
Deng, Dajun .
CANCER SCIENCE, 2009, 100 (09) :1663-1667
[6]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[7]  
DerSimonian R, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P1237, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960630)15:12<1237::AID-SIM301>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-N
[9]  
Dumitrescu Ramona G, 2012, Methods Mol Biol, V863, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-612-8_1
[10]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634