No correlation between minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block catheter for brachial plexus block: a prospective blinded cohort study

被引:0
作者
Schoenmakers, Karin P. W. [1 ]
Heesterbeek, Petra J. C. [2 ]
Jack, Nigel T. M. [1 ]
Stienstra, Rudolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Sint Maartensklin, Res Dept, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Peripheral nerve block; Nerve stimulation; Stimulating catheter; NEEDLE PLACEMENT; MOTOR RESPONSE; VALGUS REPAIR; ULTRASOUND; SENSITIVITY; LOCALIZATION; SURGERY; TRIAL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2253-14-26
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Stimulating catheters offer the possibility of delivering an electrical charge via the tip of the catheter. This may be advantageous as it allows verifying if the catheter tip is in close proximity to the target nerve, thereby increasing catheter performance. This prospective blinded cohort study was designed to investigate whether there is a correlation between the minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter, and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block (PNB) catheter as determined by 24 h postoperative morphine consumption. Methods: Forty adult patients with ASA physical health classification I-III scheduled for upper extremity surgery under combined continuous interscalene block and general anesthesia were studied. Six patients were excluded from analysis. After inserting a stimulating catheter as if it were a non-stimulating catheter for 2-5 cm through the needle, the minimal electrical charge necessary to obtain an appropriate motor response was determined. A loading dose of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.75% ropivacaine was then administered, and postoperative analgesia was provided by a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 8 mLh(-1) via the brachial plexus catheter, and an intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Main outcome measures include the minimal electrical charge (MEC) at the tip of the stimulating catheter necessary to elicit an appropriate motor response, and the efficacy of the PNB catheter as determined by 24 h postoperative PCA morphine consumption. Results: Mean (SD) [range] MEC at the tip of the stimulating catheter was 589 (1414) [30 - 5000] nC. Mean (SD) [range] 24 h morphine consumption was 8.9 (9.9) [0-29] mg. The correlation between the MEC and 24 h postoperative morphine consumption was Spearman's Rho r(s) = -0.26, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.09. Conclusion: We conclude that there is no proportional relation between MEC at the tip of the blindly inserted stimulating catheter and 24 h postoperative morphine consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The Sensitivity of Motor Responses for Detecting Catheter-Nerve Contact During Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Nerve Blocks with Stimulating Catheters [J].
Altermatt, Fernando R. ;
Corvetto, Marcia A. ;
Venegas, Camila ;
Echevarria, Ghislaine ;
Bravo, Pia ;
De la Cuadra, Juan C. ;
Irribarra, Luis A. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 113 (05) :1276-1278
[2]   Using stimulating catheters for continuous sciatic nerve block shortens onset time of surgical block and minimizes postoperative consumption of pain medication after halux valgus repair as compared with conventional nonstimulating catheters [J].
Casati, A ;
Fanelli, G ;
Koscielniak-Nielsen, Z ;
Cappelleri, G ;
Aldegheri, G ;
Danelli, G ;
Fuzier, R ;
Singelyn, F .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (04) :1192-1197
[3]   Stimulating or conventional perineural catheters after hallux valgus repair: a double-blind, pharmaco-economic evaluation [J].
Casati, A. ;
Fanelli, G. ;
Danelli, G. ;
Baciarello, M. ;
Ghisi, D. ;
Nobili, F. ;
Chelly, J. E. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 50 (10) :1284-1289
[4]   Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block with stimulating catheter and traditional technique: a prospective-randomized trial [J].
Dhir, S. ;
Ganapathy, S. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 52 (08) :1158-1166
[5]   The sensitivity of motor response to needle nerve stimulation during ultrasound guided interscalene catheter placement [J].
Fredrickson, Michael J. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2008, 33 (04) :291-296
[6]   Use of a stimulating catheter for total knee replacement surgery:: preliminary results [J].
Jack, NTM ;
Liem, EB ;
Vonhögen, LH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (02) :250-254
[7]   OBTURATOR NERVE BLOCK - AN EVALUATION OF TECHNIQUE [J].
MAGORA, F ;
ROZIN, R ;
BENMENAC.Y ;
MAGORA, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1969, 41 (08) :695-&
[8]   The Effect of Stimulating Versus Nonstimulating Catheter Techniques for Continuous Regional Anesthesia A Semiquantitative Systematic Review [J].
Morin, Astrid M. ;
Kranke, Peter ;
Wulf, Hinnerk ;
Stienstra, Rudolf ;
Eberhart, Leopold H. J. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (02) :194-199
[9]   Brachial plexus examination and localization using ultrasound and electrical stimulation - A volunteer study [J].
Perlas, A ;
Chan, VWS ;
Simons, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (02) :429-435
[10]   The sensitivity of motor response to nerve stimulation and paresthesia for nerve localization as evaluated by ultrasound [J].
Perlas, Anahi ;
Niazi, Ahtsham ;
McCartney, Colin ;
Chan, Vincent ;
Xu, Daquan ;
Abbas, Sherif .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (05) :445-450