Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections: European political parties and their benefit from online strategies?

被引:29
作者
Koc-Michalska, Karolina [1 ,2 ]
Lilleker, Darren G. [3 ]
Michalski, Tomasz [4 ]
Gibson, Rachel [5 ]
Zajac, Jan M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Audencia Business Sch, Nantes, France
[2] CEVIPOF Sci Po, Paris, France
[3] Bournemouth Univ, Fac Media & Commun, Polit Commun, Poole, Dorset, England
[4] Columbia Univ, Econ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Univ Manchester, Polit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Warsaw, Fac Psychol, Social Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Affordances; Facebook; social media; political communication; electoral campaign; interactivity; SOCIAL MEDIA AFFORDANCES; CAMPAIGN; COMMUNICATION; DISCOURSE; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1080/19331681.2020.1837707
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper examines how Facebook is used by political parties during elections to extend or accelerate their reach within the electorate and how successful these efforts are. Specifically, we compare the content and style of parties' Facebook posts during the 2014 European parliament elections, and how this affects followers' responses in terms of liking, sharing and commenting on the posts. Our findings reveal while that the timing and visual content of posts are important in increasing voters' attention, interactivity matters most. Responsive party posts on Facebooks are significantly more likely to be shared, liked, and commented on by users. Given that follower reactions, particularly sharing, helps to increase the visibility of party communication through indirect or two-step flow communication (online and offline), these findings are important in advancing our understanding of how and why social media campaigns are able to influence voters and thus affect election outcomes. For parties themselves the results provide some useful insights into what makes for an 'effective' Facebook campaign in terms of how they can accelerate the reach of their communication.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 193
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NEGATIVE BINOMIAL RE
[2]   Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion: The 2010 UK General Election [J].
Anstead, Nick ;
O'Loughlin, Ben .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2015, 20 (02) :204-220
[3]   Social Media Campaigning: Mobilization and Fundraising on Facebook [J].
Auter, Zachary J. ;
Fine, Jeffrey A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2018, 99 (01) :185-200
[4]   Sharing Is Caring! Investigating Viral Posts on Politicians' Facebook Pages During the 2014 General Election Campaign in Hungary [J].
Bene, Marton .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2017, 14 (04) :387-402
[5]  
Bennett W. L., 2013, LOGIC CONNECTIVE ACT, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139198752, DOI 10.1017/CB09781139198752]
[6]   The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US Election [J].
Bossetta, Michael .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 95 (02) :471-496
[7]  
BuddyMedia, 2012, DIGITAL MEDIA MARKET
[8]   Social media affordances: Enabling customer engagement [J].
Cabiddu, Francesca ;
De Carlo, Manuela ;
Piccoli, Gabriele .
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2014, 48 :175-192
[9]   E-campaigning on Twitter: The effectiveness of distributive promises and negative campaign in the 2013 Italian election [J].
Ceron, Andrea ;
d'Adda, Giovanna .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2016, 18 (09) :1935-1955
[10]   Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages [J].
Pletikosa Cvijikj I. ;
Michahelles F. .
Pletikosa Cvijikj, Irena (ipletikosa@ethz.ch), 1600, Springer-Verlag Wien (03) :843-861