Ultrasound- or nerve stimulation-guided wrist blocks for carpal tunnel release: A randomized prospective comparative study

被引:38
作者
Macaire, Philippe [1 ]
Singelyn, Francois [2 ]
Narchi, Patrick [2 ]
Paqueron, Xavier [2 ]
机构
[1] UAE, Dept Anesthesiol, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[2] Ctr Clin, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Soyaux, France
关键词
wrist blocks; ultrasound; nerve stimulation; subepineurium injection;
D O I
10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided wrist blocks may be faster to perform, and may increase success rate, compared with nerve stimulation-guided wrist blocks. Methods: Sixty patients Undergoing ambulatory endoscopic carpal tunnel release were randomly allocated to receive median and ulnar nerve blocks using either sensory-motor nerve stimulation (n = 30) or ultrasound guidance (n = 30). Four mL of mepivacaine 1.5% was injected around each nerve. Performance time and onset time of complete sensory block were assessed. Results: Median time to perform both median ultrasound, 55 [48-60] vs. nerve stimulation, 100 [65-150] seconds, P = .002) and ulnar (ultrasound, 57 [50-70] vs. nerve stimulation, 80 [60-105] seconds, P = .02) nerve blocks were significantly shorter in the ultrasoud group. Onset time of complete sensory block in the median (ultrasound, 370 [278-459] vs. nerve stimulation, 254 [230-300] seconds, P = .02) and ulnar (ultrasound, 367 [296-420] vs. nerve stimulation, 241 [210-300] seconds, P = .01) nerve areas were shorter in the nerve stimulation group. The success rate was 93% in both groups. Conclusions: This randomized prospective study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided wrist nerve blocks are as efficient as those performed with nerve stimulation.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 368
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Bekkelund S I, 2001, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, V121, P2829
[2]   Nerve puncture and apparent intraneural injection during ultrasound-guided axillary block does not invariably result in neurologic injury [J].
Bigeleisen, Paul E. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (04) :779-783
[3]   A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block [J].
Casati, Andrea ;
Danelli, Giorgio ;
Baciarello, Marco ;
Corradi, Maurizio ;
Leone, Stefania ;
Di Cianni, Simone ;
Fanelli, Guido .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 106 (05) :992-996
[4]   An ultrasonographic and histological study of intraneural injection and electrical stimulation in pigs [J].
Chan, Vincent W. S. ;
Brull, Richard ;
McCartney, Colin J. L. ;
Xu, Daquan ;
Abbas, Sherif ;
Shannon, Patrick .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (05) :1281-1284
[5]   Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block [J].
Chan, Vincent W. S. ;
Perlas, Anahi ;
McCartney, Colin J. L. ;
Brull, Richard ;
Xu, Daquan ;
Abbas, Sherif .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2007, 54 (03) :176-182
[6]  
CREWS JC, 1991, REGION ANESTH, V16, P314
[7]  
Delaunay L, 2001, CAN J ANAESTH, V48, P656, DOI 10.1007/BF03016199
[8]  
Derkash RS, 1996, ORTHOPEDICS, V19, P589
[9]   Ultrasonography in the current practice of regional anaesthesia [J].
Grau, Thomas .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) :175-200
[10]  
Hadzic A, 2004, REGION ANESTH PAIN M, V29, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.06.002