Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis

被引:234
作者
Weible, Christopher M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Sch Publ Affairs, Denver, CO USA
关键词
science; collaborative management; the advocacy coalition framework; policy processes; policymaking; policy process theories;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article reviews and synthesizes the uses of expert-based information in policy subsystems. The review begins by summarizing the different uses of information in the multiple streams theory, the punctuated equilibrium theory, the social construction theory, and the advocacy coalition framework. Three uses of expert-based information are identified as instrumental, learning, and political. The three uses of expert-based information are then compared across unitary, collaborative, and adversarial policy subsystems. This article synthesizes the findings in a set of propositions about the use of expert-based information in policy subsystems and about the factors that contribute to shifts from one policy subsystem to another.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 635
页数:21
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Usable knowledge in public policy [J].
Adams, D .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2004, 63 (01) :29-42
[2]   New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies [J].
Amara, N ;
Ouimet, M ;
Landry, R .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2004, 26 (01) :75-106
[3]  
[Anonymous], CIVIC ENV
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Advocacy and Agenda Setting
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NUCL POLITICS AM HIS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1993, POLICY CHANGE LEARNI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, THEORIES POLICY PROC
[9]  
BARKE RP, 1993, RISK ANAL, V13, P1585
[10]  
Baumgartner, 1993, AGENDAS INSTABILITY