Clinical study of hemodynamic changes comparing 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine

被引:10
作者
Araujo de Morais, Hecio Henrique [1 ,2 ]
Holanda Vasconcellos, Ricardo Jose [1 ]
Santos, Thiago de Santana [3 ]
Rocha, Nelson Studart [1 ]
da Costa Araujo, Fabio Andrey [1 ]
Feitosa de Carvalho, Ricardo Wathson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pernambuco, Fac Odontol Pernambuco, Tabatinga Camaragibe, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Odontol Ribeirao Preto, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY | 2013年 / 116卷 / 01期
关键词
INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; PRESSURE-RATE QUOTIENT; 3RD MOLAR REMOVAL; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; ORAL-SURGERY; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS; SURGICAL REMOVAL; DENTAL TREATMENT; CARDIAC PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2011.10.043
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate hemodynamic changes with the use of 4% articaine and 2 different concentrations of epinephrine (1:100,000 and 1:200,000) in the surgical removal of symmetrically positioned lower third molars. Study Design. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was carried out involving 42 patients each undergoing 2 surgeries on separate occasions under local anesthesia with 4% articaine and either epinephrine 1: 100,000 or 1:200,000. The following parameters were assessed at 4 different moments: systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure; heart rate; oxygen saturation; rate pressure product (RPP); and pressure rate quotient (PRQ). Results. The concentration of epinephrine did not affect diastolic blood pressure or oxygen saturation during the surgeries. Significant differences between were detected for heart rate, RPP, and PRQ (P < .05). Conclusions. The epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) in a 4% articaine solution influences hemodynamic parameters without perceptible clinical changes in healthy patients undergoing lower third molar removal.
引用
收藏
页码:E14 / E22
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Adewumi A, 2008, PEDIATR DENT, V30, P424
[2]   Bupivacaine versus lidocaine for third molar surgery: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study [J].
Bouloux, GF ;
Punnia-Moorthy, A .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (05) :510-514
[3]  
Bremerich A, 1995, Acta Stomatol Belg, V92, P101
[4]   Comparison of clonidine and epinephrine in lidocaine anaesthesia for lower third molar surgery [J].
Brkovic, B ;
Todorovic, L ;
Stojic, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 34 (04) :401-406
[5]   Epinephrine and local anesthesia revisited [J].
Brown, RS ;
Rhodus, NL .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2005, 100 (04) :401-408
[6]   A COMPARISON OF CARDIAC RATE-PRESSURE PRODUCT AND PRESSURE-RATE QUOTIENT IN HEALTHY AND MEDICALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS [J].
CAMPBELL, RL ;
LANGSTON, WG .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1995, 80 (02) :145-152
[7]  
Carrera I, 2000, Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol, V42, P1
[8]   Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal:: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study [J].
Colombini, Bella L. ;
Modena, Karin C. S. ;
Calvo, Adriana M. ;
Sakai, Vivien T. ;
Giglio, Fernando P. M. ;
Dionisio, Thiago J. ;
Trindade, Alceu S., Jr. ;
Lauris, Jose R. P. ;
Santos, Carlos F. .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2006, 102 (02) :169-174
[9]  
Costa CG, 2005, QUINTESSENCE INT, V36, P197
[10]  
Daublander M, 1997, Anesth Prog, V44, P132