Interpretive style and intolerance of uncertainty in individuals with anxiety disorders: A focus on generalized anxiety disorder

被引:45
作者
Anderson, Kristin G. [1 ]
Dugas, Michel J. [1 ,2 ]
Koerner, Naomi [3 ]
Radomsky, Adam S. [1 ]
Savard, Pierre [2 ]
Turcotte, Julie [2 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[2] Hop Sacre Coeur, Clin Troubles Anxieux, Montreal, PQ H3M 3A9, Canada
[3] Ryerson Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Generalized anxiety disorder; Interpretations; Intolerance of uncertainty; Cognitive processing; NEUROPSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW MINI; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL MODEL; INTERPRETATION BIAS; SOCIAL PHOBIA; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; BODY SENSATIONS; DSM-IV; WORRY; SENSITIVITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.08.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Interpretations of negative, positive, and ambiguous situations were examined in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), other anxiety disorders (ANX), and no psychiatric condition (CTRL). Additionally, relationships between specific beliefs about uncertainty (Uncertainty Has Negative Behavioral and Self-Referent Implications [IUS-NI], and Uncertainty Is Unfair and Spoils Everything [IUS-US]) and interpretations were explored. The first hypothesis (that the clinical groups would report more concern for negative, positive, and ambiguous situations than would the CTRL group) was supported. The second hypothesis (that the GAD group would report more concern for ambiguous situations than would the ANX group) was not supported; both groups reported similar levels of concern for ambiguous situations. Exploratory analyses revealed no differences between the GAD and ANX groups in their interpretations of positive and negative situations. Finally, the IUS-US predicted interpretations of negative and ambiguous situations in the full sample, whereas the IUS-NI did not. Clinical implications are discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 832
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Social anxiety and the interpretation of positive social events [J].
Alden, Lynn E. ;
Taylor, Charles T. ;
Mellings, Tanna M. J. B. ;
Laposa, Judith M. .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2008, 22 (04) :577-590
[2]   Interpretation bias and social anxiety [J].
Amir, N ;
Beard, C ;
Bower, E .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2005, 29 (04) :433-443
[3]   The effect of single-session interpretation modification on attention bias in socially anxious individuals [J].
Amir, Nader ;
Bomyea, Jessica ;
Beard, Courtney .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2010, 24 (02) :178-182
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[5]   A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms [J].
Beard, Courtney ;
Amir, Nader .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2008, 46 (10) :1135-1141
[6]  
Beck A.T., 1996, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT
[7]   Sensitivity and response bias in fear of spiders [J].
Becker, ES ;
Rinck, M .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2004, 18 (07) :961-976
[8]   Intolerance of uncertainty: Exploring its dimensionality and associations with need for cognitive closure, psychopathology, and personality [J].
Berenbaum, Howard ;
Bredemeier, Keith ;
Thompson, Renee J. .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2008, 22 (01) :117-125
[9]   Perfectionism, anger, and anger rumination [J].
Besharat, Mohammad Ali ;
Shahidi, Shahriar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 45 (06) :427-434
[10]   The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: structure and content re-examined [J].
Bieling, PJ ;
Antony, MM ;
Swinson, RP .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1998, 36 (7-8) :777-788