Surgical Apgar Outcome Score: Perioperative Risk Assessment for Radical Cystectomy

被引:68
作者
Prasad, Sandip M. [1 ]
Ferreria, Marcos [1 ]
Berry, Alexander M. [1 ]
Lipsitz, Stuart R. [3 ]
Richie, Jerome P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Gawande, Atul A.
Hu, Jim C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Lank Ctr Genitourinary Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
bladder; cystectomy; prognosis; perioperative complications; outcome and process assessment (health care); HEART-RATE; MORTALITY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.165
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Currently objective perioperative risk assessment metrics are lacking for radical cystectomy. Using a simple 10-point scale similar to neonatal Apgar assessment we evaluated whether a surgical outcome score calculated immediately after radical cystectomy would predict major complications and mortality. Materials and Methods: We identified 155 consecutive radical cystectomies performed between 2005 and 2007 at our institution. Data were collected on 45 preoperative and intraoperative variables. We used a framework established by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to evaluate major complications within 30 days of surgery. We used a 10-point scoring system that had been previously validated in general and vascular surgery populations, comprising estimated blood loss, lowest heart rate and lowest mean arterial pressure. Results: A total of 40 (26%) patients undergoing radical cystectomy experienced a major complication within 30 days of the operation. There was a progressive decrease in complications with increasing surgical Apgar score, in that patients with a low vs a high Apgar score were more likely to experience complications (OR 6.9, 95% CI 1.9-24.2). Coronary artery disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, intraoperative blood transfusion, volume of intravenous fluid administered and female gender were also associated with major complications (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients undergoing radical cystectomy the surgical Apgar score predicts major postoperative complications and death. This simple and objective postoperative metric may be used to dictate the intensity of care. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether treatment decisions based on this scoring system improve radical cystectomy outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1052
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tranexamic acid reduces perioperative blood transfusions following open radical cystectomy - a propensity-score matched analysis
    Egen, Luisa
    Keller, Karoline
    Menold, Hanna Saskia
    Quan, Allison
    Dempfle, Carl-Erik
    Schoettler, Jochen Johannes
    Wessels, Frederik
    Meister, Benjamin
    Worst, Thomas Stefan
    Westhoff, Niklas
    Kriegmair, Maximilian Christian
    Honeck, Patrick
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [42] The Effect of Complexity of the Surgical Field on Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy
    Elsayed, Ahmed S.
    Aldhaam, Naif A.
    Jing, Zhe
    Osei, Jennifer A.
    Hull, Brett
    Nagra, Avneet
    Siam, Alat
    Li, Qiang
    Hussein, Ahmed A.
    Guru, Khurshid A.
    UROLOGY, 2020, 141 : 95 - 100
  • [43] Comparison of perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy
    Zhang, Shiwei
    Lin, Tingsheng
    Zhang, Qing
    Zhang, Shengjie
    Liu, Guangxiang
    Ji, Changwei
    Guo, Hongqian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (02)
  • [44] Hospital volume and perioperative outcomes for radical cystectomy: a population study
    Udovicich, Cristian
    Perera, Marlon
    Huq, Molla
    Wong, Lih-Ming
    Lenaghan, Daniel
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 26 - 32
  • [45] Getting under the hood of the volume-outcome relationship for radical cystectomy
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Daignault, Stephanie
    Dunn, Rodney L.
    Gilbert, Scott
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    Miller, David C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (06) : 2095 - 2099
  • [46] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: Surgical and oncological outcomes
    Treiyer, Adrian
    Saar, Matthias
    Buetow, Zentia
    Kamradt, Joern
    Siemer, Stefan
    Stoeckle, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2012, 38 (03): : 324 - 329
  • [47] Predicting individual outcomes after radical cystectomy in urothelial variants with Cancer of the Bladder Risk Assessment (COBRA) score
    Suartz, Caio Vinicius
    Cordeiro, Mauricio Dener
    Botelho, Luiz Antonio Assan
    Gallucci, Fabio Pescarmona
    Cho, David Hamilton
    Pessoa, Filipe de Arruda
    da Silva, Flavio Rossi
    Costa, Mateus Silva Santos
    Cardili, Leonardo
    Audenet, Francois
    Mota, Jose Mauricio
    Toren, Paul
    Nahas, William Carlos
    Ribeiro-Filho, Leopoldo Alves
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [48] The impact of perioperative risk factors on long-term survival after radical cystectomy: a prospective, high-volume cohort study
    Pyrgidis, Nikolaos
    Schulz, Gerald B.
    Volz, Yannic
    Ebner, Benedikt
    Rodler, Severin
    Westhofen, Thilo
    Eismann, Lennert
    Marcon, Julian
    Stief, Christian G.
    Jokisch, Friedrich
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [49] Combining the ASA Physical Classification System and Continuous Intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score Measurement in Predicting Postoperative Risk
    Jering, Monika Zdenka
    Marolen, Khensani N.
    Shotwell, Matthew S.
    Denton, Jason N.
    Sandberg, Warren S.
    Ehrenfeld, Jesse Menachem
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 39 (11)
  • [50] The PT2D-Score: a novel tool to predict complications and economic outcome after radical cystectomy
    Kamal, M. M.
    Borgmann, H.
    Metzger, A.
    Schregel, C.
    Nabar, N. D.
    Haack, M.
    Jaeger, W.
    Tsaur, I.
    Haferkamp, A.
    Hoefner, T.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 3155 - 3160