Comparison of subcutaneous dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia: a randomized double blind control trial

被引:3
|
作者
Srinivas, Divya B. [1 ]
Lakshminarasimhaiah, Geetha [2 ]
机构
[1] Sakra World Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Bangalore 560103, Karnataka, India
[2] MS Ramaiah Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Bengaluru 560054, India
来源
LOCAL AND REGIONAL ANESTHESIA | 2019年 / 12卷
关键词
subarachnoid block; dexmedetomidine; clonidine; postoperative analgesia; INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE; WOUND INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.2147/LRA.S197386
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia and improve the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB) when used as adjuvant in various routes. However, addition of these drugs by Nor intrathecal routes are known to cause hemodynamic instability. The subcutaneous (SC) route provides similar efficacy as IV administration with less hemodynamic instability and prolonged effect. Aims: To compare the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to SAB when used subcutaneously. Materials and methods: A total of 90 patients were randomized into one of the three groups: Group P received 1 ml of Normal saline SC, Group D received 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmeditomedine SC and Group C received 1 mcg/kg of clonidine SC respectively after SAB with 3m1 of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (15 mg). Time of onset of sensory and motor block, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative VAS scores, Richmond agitation sedation scale, duration of postoperative analgesia and mean paracetamol requirement in 24 hours were recorded. Results: Mean duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in group D (838.10 +/- 348.22 minutes) and group C (816.67 +/- 230.48 minutes) when compared to group P (332.10 +/- 110.91 minutes). Total paracetamol consumption was less in group D (1400.00 +/- 770.13 mg) and group C (1600.00 +/- 674.66 mg), whereas it was 1900.00 +/- 758.86 mg in group P. Hemodynamic parameters, maximum sensory level attained, and time to attain maximum sensory levels were comparable among the two groups. Conclusion: Both subcutaneous clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic requirements when used as adjuvants to SAB with stable hemodynamics, hence both of these drugs can be used effectively as adjuvants to SAB.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clonidine as an adjuvant in monitored anesthesia care for ENT surgeries: A prospective, randomized, double blind placebo controlled study
    Kumari, Indira
    Naithani, Udita
    Harsha
    Singhal, Yogendra
    Meena, Khemraj
    Mohan, Madhan
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 19 (03) : 260 - 268
  • [22] Pediatric premedication: a double-blind randomized trial of dexmedetomidine or ketamine alone versus a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine
    Hui Qiao
    Zhi Xie
    Jie Jia
    BMC Anesthesiology, 17
  • [23] Intravenous dexmedetomidine versus intravenous clonidine for post spinal anesthesia shivering: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Na
    Wang, Zaitang
    Song, Xuesong
    Wang, Jinguo
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 65 (03) : 94 - 102
  • [24] The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine as a 0.59% ropivacaine adjuvant for epidural anesthesia in great saphenous varicose vein surgery, based on hemodynamics and anesthesia efficacy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
    Zeng, Sisi
    Li, Xuechao
    Xu, Hongchun
    Ye, Qin
    Li, Zhaogang
    Wang, Fangjun
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [25] A double-blinded randomized control trial to compare the duration of analgesia using morphine, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in caudal anesthesia in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries
    Pallapati, Aparanjit Paul
    Jose, Riya
    Devadharshini, Beulah
    Gowri, Mahasampath
    Joselyn, Anita S.
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 40 (03) : 388 - 394
  • [26] Comparison of clonidine versus midazolam in monitored anesthesia care during ENT surgery-A prospective, double blind, randomized clinical study
    Kumari, Indira
    Naithni, Udita
    Bedi, Vikram
    Gupta, Sapna
    Gupta, Rajesh
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2012, 16 (02) : 157 - 164
  • [27] DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT WITH HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA: A DOUBLE BLIND CONTROLLED STUDY
    Sunil, B., V
    Sahana, K. S.
    Jajee, P. R.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (18): : 7604 - 7611
  • [28] Effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on recovery of gastrointestinal function after caesarean section undergoing spinal and epidural anesthesia: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Sun, Jing-jing
    Wang, Huan
    Tang, Li-li
    Jiang, Hui
    Liu, Xue-sheng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 297 : 30 - 35
  • [29] Comparison of intrathecal versus intra-articular dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine on postoperative pain following knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical trial
    Ismail, Eman A.
    Sayed, Jehan A.
    Bakri, Mohamed H.
    Mahfouz, Reda Z.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2017, 30 (02) : 134 - 141
  • [30] DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT WITH HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA: A DOUBLE BLIND CONTROLLED STUDY
    Sunil, B., V
    Sahana, K. S.
    Jajee, P. R.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (40): : 7604 - 7611