Comparison of subcutaneous dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia: a randomized double blind control trial

被引:3
|
作者
Srinivas, Divya B. [1 ]
Lakshminarasimhaiah, Geetha [2 ]
机构
[1] Sakra World Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Bangalore 560103, Karnataka, India
[2] MS Ramaiah Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Bengaluru 560054, India
来源
LOCAL AND REGIONAL ANESTHESIA | 2019年 / 12卷
关键词
subarachnoid block; dexmedetomidine; clonidine; postoperative analgesia; INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE; WOUND INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.2147/LRA.S197386
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia and improve the quality of subarachnoid block (SAB) when used as adjuvant in various routes. However, addition of these drugs by Nor intrathecal routes are known to cause hemodynamic instability. The subcutaneous (SC) route provides similar efficacy as IV administration with less hemodynamic instability and prolonged effect. Aims: To compare the efficacy of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to SAB when used subcutaneously. Materials and methods: A total of 90 patients were randomized into one of the three groups: Group P received 1 ml of Normal saline SC, Group D received 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmeditomedine SC and Group C received 1 mcg/kg of clonidine SC respectively after SAB with 3m1 of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (15 mg). Time of onset of sensory and motor block, intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative VAS scores, Richmond agitation sedation scale, duration of postoperative analgesia and mean paracetamol requirement in 24 hours were recorded. Results: Mean duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in group D (838.10 +/- 348.22 minutes) and group C (816.67 +/- 230.48 minutes) when compared to group P (332.10 +/- 110.91 minutes). Total paracetamol consumption was less in group D (1400.00 +/- 770.13 mg) and group C (1600.00 +/- 674.66 mg), whereas it was 1900.00 +/- 758.86 mg in group P. Hemodynamic parameters, maximum sensory level attained, and time to attain maximum sensory levels were comparable among the two groups. Conclusion: Both subcutaneous clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia and reduced analgesic requirements when used as adjuvants to SAB with stable hemodynamics, hence both of these drugs can be used effectively as adjuvants to SAB.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to lignocaine with adrenaline in infiltration anesthesia in tympanoplasty: A randomized controlled trial
    Mathur, Veena
    Kumar, Pradeep
    Mittal, Sonam
    Meena, Deepika
    Singh, Maina
    Patodi, Veena
    INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2024, 25 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [2] A prospective, randomized, double-blinded control study on comparison of tramadol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine for post spinal anesthesia shivering
    Venkatraman, Rajagopalan
    Karthik, Krishnamoorthy
    Pushparani, Anand
    Mahalakshmi, Annadurai
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2018, 68 (01): : 42 - 48
  • [3] Comparison of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgery: a randomized trial
    Taher-Baneh, Naseh
    Ghadamie, Negin
    Sarshivi, Farzad
    Sahraie, Reza
    Nasseri, Karim
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (04): : 369 - 376
  • [4] Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to lignocaine with adrenaline in infiltration anesthesia for tympanoplasty
    Shende, Seema
    Chakravarty, Nupur
    Raghuwanshi, Shiv Kumar
    Shidhaye, Ramchandra Vinayak
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 20 (03) : 309 - 314
  • [5] Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine in lower limb surgery: A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial
    Suthar, Omprakash
    Sethi, Priyanka
    Sharma, U. D.
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 19 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [6] A comparative evaluation of midazolam, clonidine and dexmedetomidine as oral premedicants in children: A double blind randomized clinical trial
    Arora, Suman
    Saini, Kulbhushan
    Bhardwaj, Neerja
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2014, 18 (04) : 355 - 360
  • [7] Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in saddle anesthesia for anoplasty: a correlative randomized double-blinded trial
    Seyam, Sameh Hamdy Abdelhamid
    Abdelgawad, Ismail Mohamed
    Abdelhalim, Mohamed Abdelgawad
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 28 (02) : 302 - 309
  • [8] COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND CLONIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK: A RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Munshi, Fayaz Ahmad
    Bano, Fahmeeda
    Khan, Aftab Ahmad
    Saleem, Basharat
    Rather, Mushtaq Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (42): : 7263 - 7268
  • [9] Dexmedetomidine versus Nefopam for the management of post-spinal anesthesia shivering: A randomized double-blind controlled study
    Mohamed, Hatem Saber
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 31 (04) : 315 - 320
  • [10] Effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on shivering after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Nasseri, Karim
    Ghadami, Negin
    Nouri, Bijan
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2017, 11 : 1 - 7