TO EVALUATE THE HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ETOMIDATE AND A COMBINATION OF ETOMIDATE AND PROPOFOL AS INDUCTION AGENTS IN ELECTIVE SURGERIES

被引：0

作者：

Puri, Anisha ^{[1
]}

Dwivedi, Manisha Bhatt ^{[1
]}

Arora, Pranav ^{[1
]}

Vijay, Divya ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Maharishi Markandeshwar Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesia, Mullana, Haryana, India

来源：

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS | 2019年 / 8卷 / 09期

关键词：

Haemodynamic; Induction; Propofol; Etomidate; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANESTHETIC INDUCTION; ENDOCRINE RESPONSE; TRIAL;

D O I：

10.14260/jemds/2019/123

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

BACKGROUND Haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation are the major concern during induction under general anaesthesia. Our study aims to compare the haemodynamic changes between etomidate versus a combination of etomidate and propofol. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty patients in age group of 18-50 years of ASA grade I and II were divided randomly into two groups of thirty patients each. Haemodynamic data was observed and compared. Sample size was taken for convenience. RESULTS Statistically significant difference was found in heart rate (p=0.000 at induction; p=0.0001 at 1 min after intubation) and MAP in both the groups at 0 min (p=0.0008) and after 1 minute (p=0.004) of induction with haemodynamic parameters significantly higher in etomidate group than the etofol group. There was no statistically significant difference at 2 mins, 5 mins, 10 mins, 20 mins, 30 mins and 60 mins between the two groups. CONCLUSION The combination of etomidate and propofol is an alternative to etomidate alone in patients where laryngoscopic response to haemodynamic parameters is a concern.

引用

页码：555 / 558

页数：4

共 28 条

[1]

Aggarwal S, 2016, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V66, P237, DOI [10.1016/j.bjan.2016.02.010, 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.10.005]

[2] Propofol causes more hypotension than etomidate in patients with severe aortic stenosis:: a double-blind, randomized study comparing propofol and etomidate [J].

Bendel, S. ;

Ruokonen, E. ;

Polonen, P. ;

Uusaro, A. .

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 51 (03) :284-289

[3] Efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen and lidocaine on propofol injection pain [J].

Canbay, O. ;

Celebi, N. ;

Arun, O. ;

Karagoz, A. H. ;

Saricaoglu, F. ;

Ozgen, S. .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (01) :95-98

[4]

Creagh O, 2010, P R HEALTH SCI J, V29, P91

[5]

Guzelmeric F, 2007, TURKISH J THORAC CAR, V15, P82

[6] Hemodynamic Changes following Anesthesia Induction and LMA Insertion with Propofol, Etomidate, and Propofol [J].

Hosseinzadeh, Hamzeh ;

Golzari, Samad E. J. ;

Torabi, Effat ;

Dehdilani, Marjan .

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH, 2013, 5 (03) :109-112

[7]

Hosten T, 2007, TRAK UNIV TIP FAK DE, V24, P114

[8]

Kalogridaki M, 2011, HELL J CARDIOL, V52, P483

[9]

Karcioglu M, 2014, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V64, P365, DOI [10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.009, 10.1016/j.bjan.2013.06.010]

[10] Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass [J].

Kaushal, Ram Prasad ;

Vatal, Ajay ;

Pathak, Radhika .

ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 18 (02) :172-178

← 1 2 3 →