The Dynamics of Advice Giving by Venture Capital Firms: Antecedents of Managerial Cognitive Effort

被引:20
作者
Bacon-Gerasymenko, Violetta [1 ]
Eggers, J. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] NYU, New York, NY USA
关键词
managerial cognitive effort; managerial cognition; advice giving; venture capital; learning from experience; cognitive constraints; LIMITED ATTENTION; BEHAVIORAL-THEORY; STRATEGIC ACTION; BUSINESS MODEL; PERFORMANCE; CEO; EXPERIENCE; EXPLORATION; BOARD; ENTREPRENEURS;
D O I
10.1177/0149206317721626
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates what leads managers to allocate constrained cognitive effort toward new versus familiar aspects of a business. Specifically, we explore advice giving by venture capital firms (VCs) to their portfolio companies, distinguishing between business topics on which a VC has advised other ventures in the past and topics new to the VC that may be outside its areas of expertise. We use both demand-side (venture-driven) and supply-side (VC-driven) perspectives to offer a novel theory about the antecedents of cognitive effort underlying advice giving. Empirical tests in a unique data set of French VCs show that both perspectives explain important aspects of advice-giving dynamics for VCs. VCs facing dynamic environments and capacity constraints strongly respond to stimuli from ventures, but VCs also adjust their behavior as they accumulate experience in ways that reflect both expanding confidence in their ability to add value and concerns about overextension of their efforts, depending on the valence of VC experience. Our findings provide important insights to the antecedents of cognitive effort and to research on the VC-venture relationship by exploring the dynamics of how advice-giving relationships evolve over time as VCs gain experience.
引用
收藏
页码:1660 / 1688
页数:29
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities [J].
Adner, R ;
Helfat, CE .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (10) :1011-1025
[2]   Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence [J].
Amit, R ;
Brander, J ;
Zott, C .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1998, 13 (06) :441-466
[3]  
Argote L., 2012, Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01970.x
[4]   A Behavioral Theory of the Firm -: 40 years and counting:: Introduction and impact [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Greve, Henrich R. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :337-349
[5]   Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists [J].
Arthurs, JD ;
Busenitz, LW .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2006, 21 (02) :195-215
[6]   COGNITIVE CHANGE, STRATEGIC ACTION, AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL [J].
BARR, PS ;
STIMPERT, JL ;
HUFF, AS .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1992, 13 :15-36
[7]   IPOs versus Acquisitions and the Valuation Premium Puzzle: A Theory of Exit Choice by Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists [J].
Bayar, Onur ;
Chemmanur, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2011, 46 (06) :1755-1793
[8]   Short- and Long-Term Performance Feedback and Absorptive Capacity [J].
Ben-Oz, Chanan ;
Greve, Henrich R. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 (07) :1827-1853
[9]   How firms learn heuristics: Uncovering missing components of organizational learning [J].
Bingham, Christopher B. ;
Haleblian, Jerayr .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2012, 6 (02) :152-177
[10]   RATIONAL HEURISTICS: THE 'SIMPLE RULES' THAT STRATEGISTS LEARN FROM PROCESS EXPERIENCE [J].
Bingham, Christopher B. ;
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (13) :1437-1464