A Bi-level Framework for Understanding Prisoner Victimization

被引:36
作者
Wooldredge, John [1 ]
Steiner, Benjamin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Criminal Justice, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Sch Criminol & Criminal Justice, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Inmate victimization; Opportunity theory; Inmates; Prisons; PHYSICAL VICTIMIZATION; INMATE; VIOLENCE; CRIME; RATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10940-013-9197-y
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
To present and test an opportunity perspective on prison inmate victimization. Stratified random samples of inmates (n (1) = 5,640) were selected from Ohio and Kentucky prisons (n (2) = 46). Bi-level models of the prevalence of assaults and thefts were estimated. Predictors included indicators of inmate routines/guardianship, target antagonism, and target vulnerability at the individual level, and several indicators of guardianship at the facility level. Assaults were more common among inmates with certain routines and characteristics that might have increased their odds of being victimized (e.g., less time spent in recreation; committed violence themselves during incarceration), and higher levels of assaults characterized environments with lower levels of guardianship (e.g., architectural designs with more "blind spots", larger populations, and less rigorous rule enforcement as perceived by correctional officers). Similar findings emerged for thefts in addition to stronger individual level effects in prisons with weaker guardianship (e.g., ethnic group differences in the risk of theft were greater in facilities with larger populations and less rigorous rule enforcement). The study produced evidence favoring a bi-level opportunity perspective of inmate victimization, with some unique differences in the relevance of particular concepts between prison and non-prison contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 162
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] AGE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES: A BLOCKED OPPORTUNITY APPROACH
    Felson, Richard B.
    Cundiff, Patrick
    Painter-Davis, Noah
    [J]. CRIMINOLOGY, 2012, 50 (04) : 887 - 911
  • [12] Finkelhor D, 1996, Violence Vict, V11, P3
  • [13] Garofalo J, 1986, POSITIVE CRIMINOLOGY
  • [14] THE EXERCISE OF POWER IN COERCIVE ORGANIZATIONS: A STUDY OF PRISON GUARDS
    Hepburn, John R.
    [J]. CRIMINOLOGY, 1985, 23 (01) : 145 - 164
  • [15] Hindelang MJ., 1978, VICTIMS PERSONAL CRI
  • [16] Hough M., 1987, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V3, P355, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01066836
  • [17] Hox J. J., 2010, Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications, V2nd, DOI [10.4324/9781315650982, DOI 10.4324/9781315650982]
  • [18] Ireland JL, 1999, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V25, P161, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:3<161::AID-AB1>3.0.CO
  • [19] 2-#
  • [20] Irwin John., 2005, The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class