A comparison of maladaptive schemata in treatment-seeking obese adults and normal-weight control subjects

objectives: The aims of this study were to determine whether treatment-seeking obese adults display a greater severity of maladaptive schemata than normal-weight adults and to investigate the possible correlates of maladaptive schemata among obese individuals. Methods: The sample included 52 obese adults participating in a weight loss treatment and 39 normal-weight adults. Participants in the obese and normal-weight control groups completed standardized self-report questionnaires designed to assess attitudes and behaviors regarding eating and weight (Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns-Revised and Binge Eating Scale), maladaptive schemata (Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Version), mood disturbance (Profile of Mood States-Adolsecents) and socially desirable responding (Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding). Results: The obese patients reported a significantly greater severity of maladaptive schemata (after controlling for demographic variables and binge eating disorder status) than the normal-weight control subjects. In addition, within the obese group, there were significant positive correlations between the severity of maladaptive schema scores and both mood disturbance and problem eating scores. Conclusion: The present findings suggest that obesity may be associated with a higher severity of maladaptive schemata, at least among those obese individuals who have sought treatment. Possible etiological and treatment implications of the findings are discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.