Business sustainability factors and stock price informativeness

被引:104
作者
Ng, Anthony C. [1 ]
Rezaee, Zabihollah [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Dept Accounting, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Univ Memphis, Fogelman Coll Business & Econ, 300 Fogelman Coll Adm Bldg, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
Sustainability performance; Sustainability disclosure; Stock Price Informativeness; Idiosyncratic volatility; Abnormal turnover; Corporate governance; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; IDIOSYNCRATIC RISK; NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; GO GREEN; FIRM; MARKET; COMPANIES; EARNINGS; VOLATILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101688
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether and how business sustainability performance and disclosure factors affect stock price informativeness (SPI). We find that non-financial environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainability performance factors are positively associated with idiosyncratic volatility (our proxy for SPI) after controlling for financial-economic performance. We further show that the association between sustainability performance factors and SPI is stronger for firms with higher sustainability disclosure. We find that the association between ESG sustainability performance factors and SPI is stronger when economic performance is weaker, suggesting that investors tend to pay more attention to ESG performance factors when firms are financially underperforming. This study shows that investors pay attention to both firm economic performance (corporate profitability and growth prospect) and ESG sustainability performance and disclosure factors, which have implications for policymakers, regulators, investors, businesses, and researchers.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, STAT INT SUST REP 20
[2]   The determinants of corporate sustainability performance [J].
Artiach, Tracy ;
Lee, Darren ;
Nelson, David ;
Walker, Julie .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2010, 50 (01) :31-51
[3]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[4]   Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Salomon, Robert M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) :1101-1122
[5]   Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration [J].
Bebbington, Jan ;
Larrinaga, Carlos .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2014, 39 (06) :395-413
[6]   Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatility [J].
Becchetti, Leonardo ;
Ciciretti, Rocco ;
Hasan, Iftekhar .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 35 :297-309
[7]   Corporate social responsibility and capital allocation efficiency [J].
Bhandari, Avishek ;
Javakhadze, David .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2017, 43 :354-377
[8]  
Business Roundtable (BR), 2019, STAT PURP CORP
[9]  
Campbell JL, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P946, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684
[10]   Can Growth Options Explain the Trend in Idiosyncratic Risk? [J].
Cao, Charles ;
Simin, Timothy ;
Zhao, Jing .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (06) :2599-2633