Why is diversification an attractive farm adjustment strategy? Insights from Texas farmers and ranchers

被引:253
作者
Barbieri, Carla [1 ]
Mahoney, Edward [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Community Agr Recreat & Resource Studies, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Agricultural diversification; Enterprise diversification; Multifunctionality; Motivations; Factor analysis; NORTHERN PENNINES; RURAL TOURISM; ENTERPRISES; GOALS; BUSINESS; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.06.001
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
State agencies have been encouraging the development of different enterprises to diversify farm incomes in an effort to retain farmers in business, attract new entrants to agriculture and promote regional development. Entrepreneurship and farming are known to be driven by a complex set of goals including those which are economic and intrinsic in nature. However, little information is available regarding the set of goals that drive agriculture entrepreneurship, preventing state agencies to adequately target potential diversifiers. This paper provides abetter understanding of the range of goals, both financial and nonfinancial, that are important in farmers' decisions to diversify their operations. The generation of additional income, the continuance of farming and ranching, and the enhancement of quality of life are among the most important diversification goals in Texas. A principal component factor analysis performed on the importance ratings of diversification goals resulted in six dimensions: (F1) Reduce Uncertainty and Risk; (F2) Grow and Service Markets; (F3) Enhanced Financial Condition; (F4) Individual Aspirations and Pursuits: (F5) Revenues Enhancement; and (F6) Family Connections. The study also examined the relationship between various entrepreneur and farm characteristics and the goal pursuit dimensions. Operator's age, number of generations the farm had been in the family, household income, number of farm employees, and distance to an urbanized area influence types of goals pursued through diversification. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 66
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Alsos G.A., 2003, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, V10, P435, DOI DOI 10.1108/14626000310504747
[2]  
*AM FARML TRUST, GOING GOING GON IMP
[3]   Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content [J].
Austin, JT ;
Vancouver, JB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (03) :338-375
[4]  
BARBIERI C, 2008, 2008 NE RECR RES S S
[5]  
BARBIERI C, 2006, THESIS MICHIGAN STAT
[6]   Understanding the nature and extent of farm and ranch diversification in North America [J].
Barbieri, Carla ;
Mahoney, Edward ;
Butler, Larry .
RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2008, 73 (02) :205-229
[7]   The role of the firm and owner characteristics on the performance of agritourism farms [J].
Barbieri, Carla ;
Mshenga, Patience M. .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2008, 48 (02) :166-183
[8]  
Barlas Y, 2001, RURAL SOCIOL, V66, P342, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00071.x
[9]   THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF DIVERSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR FRENCH FARM HOUSEHOLDS [J].
BENJAMIN, C .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1994, 10 (04) :331-342
[10]   Fitting in and multi-tasking: Dutch farm women's strategies in rural entrepreneurship [J].
Bock, BB .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2004, 44 (03) :245-+