Performance measurement of product returns with recovery for sustainable manufacturing

被引:38
作者
Nagalingam, Sev V. [1 ]
Kuik, Swee S. [2 ]
Amer, Yousef [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sch Management, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Engn, Barbara Hardy Inst, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Sustainable manufacturing; Supply chain management; Product returns management; Performance measurement; SUPPLY-CHAIN MANAGEMENT; ECO-DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcim.2013.05.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Today's lifecycle of new and emerging products, increase in labour costs in developed countries and user's expectations or behaviours including frequently upgrading items with latest features, influence the growth rate of product disposal to landfill. To reduce the negative impact on the environment, global manufacturers need to take responsibility for designing sustainable products and implementing cleaner production systems for 3R operations (3R-Reuse/Remanufacture/Recycle). Nevertheless, there is still a lack of comprehensive measures for assessing product returns with recovery settings. In this paper, a framework for performance evaluation using design for six sigma methodology is developed to estimate utilisation value of a manufactured product with recovery settings, which accounts for total recovery cost, manufacturing lead-time, minimisation for landfill waste and quality characteristic. Finally, a numerical example based on these performance attributes to assess product utilisation value is presented. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 483
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Case study: Optimizing order fulfillment in a global retail supply chain [J].
Amer, Yousef ;
Luong, Lee ;
Lee, Sang-Heon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 127 (02) :278-291
[2]   Is six sigma a management fad or fact? [J].
Antony, Jiju .
ASSEMBLY AUTOMATION, 2007, 27 (01) :17-19
[3]   Six sigma in service organisations Benefits, challenges and difficulties, common myths, empirical observations and success factors [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Antony, Frenie Jiju ;
Kumar, Maneesh ;
Cho, Byung Rae .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 24 (03) :294-+
[4]  
Badurdeen Fazleena, 2009, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, V4, P49, DOI 10.1504/IJPLM.2009.031666
[5]   Reverse supply chains for commercial returns [J].
Blackburn, JD ;
Guide, VDR ;
Souza, GC ;
Van Wassenhove, LN .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 46 (02) :6-+
[6]   Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement [J].
Byggeth, Sophie ;
Hochschorner, Elisabeth .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (15-16) :1420-1430
[7]  
Carter C.R., 1998, J BUS LOGIST, V19, P85
[8]   A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory [J].
Carter, Craig R. ;
Rogers, Dale S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (5-6) :360-387
[9]   On pyrolysis of waste tire: Degradation rate and product yields [J].
Chang, YM .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1996, 17 (02) :125-139
[10]  
Das K, 2011, INT J PRODUCTION EC