Comparative Utility of the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest for Predicting Falls in Individuals With Parkinson Disease: A Cohort Study

被引:89
作者
Duncan, Ryan P. [1 ]
Leddy, Abigail L. [2 ]
Cavanaugh, James T. [3 ]
Dibble, Leland E. [4 ]
Ellis, Terry D. [5 ]
Ford, Matthew P. [6 ]
Foreman, K. Bo [4 ]
Earhart, Gammon M. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Program Phys Therapy, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
[2] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ New England, Dept Phys Therapy, Portland, ME USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Phys Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Boston Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Athlet Training, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Phys Therapy, Birmingham, AL USA
[7] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Program Phys Therapy, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
[8] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2013年 / 93卷 / 04期
关键词
PEOPLE; RISK;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20120302
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The newly developed Brief-Balance Evaluation System Test (Brief-BESTest) may be useful for measuring balance and predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). Objectives. The purposes of this study were: (1) to describe the balance performance of those with PD using the Brief-BESTest, (2) to determine the relationships among the scores derived from the 3 versions of the BESTest (ie, full BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest), and (3) to compare the accuracy of the Brief-BESTest with that of the Mini-BESTest and BESTest in identifying recurrent fallers among people with PD. Design. This was a prospective cohort study. Methods. Eighty participants with PD completed a baseline balance assessment. All participants reported a fall history during the previous 6 months. Fall history was again collected 6 months (n=51) and 12 months (n=40) later. Results. At baseline, participants, had varying levels of balance impairment, and Brief-BESTest scores were significantly correlated with Mini-BESTest (r=.94, P<.001) and BESTest (r=.95, P<.001) scores. Six-month retrospective fall prediction accuracy of the Brief-BESTest was moderately high (area under the curve [AUC]=0.82, sensitivity=0.76, and specificity=0.84). Prospective fall prediction accuracy over 6 months was similarly accurate (AUC=0.88, sensitivity=0.71, and specificity=0.87), but was less sensitive over 12 months (AUC=0.76, sensitivity=0.53, and specificity=0.93). Limitations. The sample included primarily individuals with mild to moderate PD. Also, there was a moderate dropout rate at 6 and 12 months. Conclusions. All versions of the BESTest were reasonably accurate in identifying future recurrent fallers, especially during the 6 months following assessment. Clinicians can reasonably rely on the Brief-BESTest for predicting falls, particularly when time and equipment constraints are of concern.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 550
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (05) :644-647
[2]   Predicting fallers in a community-based sample of people with Parkinson's disease [J].
Ashburn, A ;
Stack, E ;
Pickering, RM ;
Ward, CD .
GERONTOLOGY, 2001, 47 (05) :277-281
[3]   Falls and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: A review of two interconnected, episodic phenomena [J].
Bloem, BR ;
Hausdorff, JA ;
Visser, JE ;
Giladi, N .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2004, 19 (08) :871-884
[4]   Risk of Falls in Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study of 160 Patients [J].
Contreras, Ana ;
Grandas, Francisco .
PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2012, 2012
[5]  
COUGHLIN L, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P192
[6]   FORGETTING FALLS - THE LIMITED ACCURACY OF RECALL OF FALLS IN THE ELDERLY [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
NEVITT, MC ;
KIDD, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1988, 36 (07) :613-616
[7]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[8]   Charting the progression of disability in parkinson disease: study protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study [J].
Dibble, Leland E. ;
Cavanaugh, James T. ;
Earhart, Gammon M. ;
Ellis, Terry D. ;
Ford, Matthew P. ;
Foreman, Kenneth B. .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2010, 10
[9]   Accuracy of Fall Prediction in Parkinson Disease: Six-Month and 12-Month Prospective Analyses [J].
Duncan, Ryan P. ;
Leddy, Abigail L. ;
Cavanaugh, James T. ;
Dibble, Leland E. ;
Ellis, Terry D. ;
Ford, Matthew P. ;
Foreman, K. Bo ;
Earhart, Gammon M. .
PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2012, 2012
[10]   USING PSYCHOMETRIC TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE THE BALANCE EVALUATION SYSTEMS TEST: THE MINI-BESTEST [J].
Franchignoni, Franco ;
Horak, Fay ;
Godi, Marco ;
Nardone, Antonio ;
Giordano, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (04) :323-331