Simulation of an HDR "Boost" with Stereotactic Proton versus Photon Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Feasibility Study

被引:0
|
作者
Remick, Jill S. [1 ]
Sabouri, Pouya [2 ]
Zhu, Mingyao [2 ,3 ]
Bentzen, Soren M. [2 ]
Sun, Kai [2 ]
Kwok, Young [2 ]
Kaiser, Adeel [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Miami Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
prostate cancer; brachytherapy; stereotactic radiation therapy; proton therapy; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ASCENDE-RT; UNCERTAINTIES; ESCALATION; ALPHA/BETA; TOXICITY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-20-00029.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objectives: To compare the dose escalation potential of stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) versus stereotactic body photon therapy (SBXT) using high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-B) dose-prescription metrics. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients previously treated with radiation for prostate cancer were identified and stratified by prostate size (<= 50cc; n = 13, > 50cc; n = 12). Initial CT simulation scans were re-planned using SBXT and SBPT modalities using a prescription dose of 19Gy in 2 fractions. Target coverage goals were designed to mimic the dose distributions of HDR-B and maximized to the upper limit constraint for the rectum and urethra. Dosimetric parameters between SBPT and SBXT were compared using the signed-rank test and again after stratification for prostate size (<= 50cm(3) and >50cm(3)) using the Wilcoxon rank test. Results: Prostate volume receiving 100% of the dose (V100) was significantly greater for SBXT (99%) versus SBPT (96%) (P <= 0.01), whereas the median V125 (82% vs. 73%, P < 0.01) and V200 (12% vs. 2%, P < 0.01) was significantly greater for SBPT compared to SBXT. Median V150 was 49% for both cohorts (P = 0.92). V125 and V200 were significantly correlated with prostate size. For prostates > 50cm(3), V200 was significantly greater with SBPT compared to SBXT (14.5% vs. 1%, P = 0.005), but not for prostates 50cm(3) (9% vs 4%, P = 0.11). Median dose to 2cm(3) of the bladder neck was significantly lower with SBPT versus SBXT (9.6 Gy vs. 14 Gy, P < 0.01). Conclusion: SBPT and SBXT can be used to simulate an HDR-B boost for locally advanced prostate cancer. SBPT demonstrated greater dose escalation potential than SBXT. These results are relevant for future trial design, particularly in patients with high risk prostate cancer who are not amenable to brachytherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reducing the Cost of Proton Radiation Therapy: The Feasibility of a Streamlined Treatment Technique for Prostate Cancer
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    Zhang, Rui
    Jones, Timothy G.
    Giebeler, Annelise
    Taddei, Phillip J.
    Stewart, Robert D.
    Lee, Andrew
    Vassiliev, Oleg
    CANCERS, 2015, 7 (02): : 688 - 705
  • [42] A dosimetric comparison of proton versus photon irradiation for paediatric glomus tumour: a case study
    Vidal, Gabriel S.
    Arntzen, Julie
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Henson, Christina
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 22
  • [43] Long-term results of a phase II study of hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer: moderate versus extreme hypofractionation
    Ha, Boram
    Cho, Kwan Ho
    Lee, Kang Hyun
    Joung, Jae Young
    Kim, Yeon-Joo
    Lee, Sung Uk
    Kim, Hyunjung
    Suh, Yang-Gun
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Lim, Young Kyung
    Jeong, Jong Hwi
    Kim, Haksoo
    Park, Weon Seo
    Kim, Sun Ho
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [44] Biological impact of dosimetric perturbations of a fiducial marker and the daily number of fields in proton therapy for prostate cancer
    Sagara, Tatstuhiko
    Kato, Takahiro
    Murakami, Masao
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [45] Double-scattered proton-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer: A dosimetric comparison with photon-based stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Hoppe, Bradford S.
    Huh, Soon
    Flampouri, Stella
    Nichols, Romaine C.
    Oliver, Kenneth R.
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    Li, Zuofeng
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (03) : 425 - 430
  • [46] A pilot study on dosimetric and radiomics analysis o urethral strictures following HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Tsang, Yat Man
    Vignarajah, Dinesh
    Mcwilliam, Alan
    Tharmalingam, Hannah
    Lowe, Gerry
    Choudhury, Ananya
    Hoskin, Peter
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1106)
  • [47] Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
    Kissel, Manon
    Crehange, Gilles
    Graff, Pierre
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [48] A simulation study on the dosimetric benefit of real-time motion compensation in spot-scanning proton therapy for prostate
    Fujii, Yusuke
    Matsuura, Taeko
    Takao, Seishin
    Matsuzaki, Yuka
    Fujii, Takaaki
    Miyamoto, Naoki
    Umegaki, Kikuo
    Nishioka, Kentaro
    Shimizu, Shinichi
    Shirato, Hiroki
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 58 (04) : 591 - 597
  • [49] HDR monotherapy for prostate cancer: A simulation study to determine the effect of catheter displacement on target coverage and normal tissue irradiation
    Kolkman-Deurloo, Inger-Karine K.
    Roos, Martin A.
    Aluwini, Shafak
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (02) : 192 - 197
  • [50] Ultra-Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: Passive Scattering versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
    Borowicz, Dorota Maria
    Shipulin, Konstantin N.
    Mytsin, Gennady V.
    Skrobala, Agnieszka
    Milecki, Piotr
    Gayevsky, Victor N.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (12):