Simulation of an HDR "Boost" with Stereotactic Proton versus Photon Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Feasibility Study

被引:0
|
作者
Remick, Jill S. [1 ]
Sabouri, Pouya [2 ]
Zhu, Mingyao [2 ,3 ]
Bentzen, Soren M. [2 ]
Sun, Kai [2 ]
Kwok, Young [2 ]
Kaiser, Adeel [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Miami Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
prostate cancer; brachytherapy; stereotactic radiation therapy; proton therapy; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ASCENDE-RT; UNCERTAINTIES; ESCALATION; ALPHA/BETA; TOXICITY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-20-00029.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objectives: To compare the dose escalation potential of stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) versus stereotactic body photon therapy (SBXT) using high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-B) dose-prescription metrics. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients previously treated with radiation for prostate cancer were identified and stratified by prostate size (<= 50cc; n = 13, > 50cc; n = 12). Initial CT simulation scans were re-planned using SBXT and SBPT modalities using a prescription dose of 19Gy in 2 fractions. Target coverage goals were designed to mimic the dose distributions of HDR-B and maximized to the upper limit constraint for the rectum and urethra. Dosimetric parameters between SBPT and SBXT were compared using the signed-rank test and again after stratification for prostate size (<= 50cm(3) and >50cm(3)) using the Wilcoxon rank test. Results: Prostate volume receiving 100% of the dose (V100) was significantly greater for SBXT (99%) versus SBPT (96%) (P <= 0.01), whereas the median V125 (82% vs. 73%, P < 0.01) and V200 (12% vs. 2%, P < 0.01) was significantly greater for SBPT compared to SBXT. Median V150 was 49% for both cohorts (P = 0.92). V125 and V200 were significantly correlated with prostate size. For prostates > 50cm(3), V200 was significantly greater with SBPT compared to SBXT (14.5% vs. 1%, P = 0.005), but not for prostates 50cm(3) (9% vs 4%, P = 0.11). Median dose to 2cm(3) of the bladder neck was significantly lower with SBPT versus SBXT (9.6 Gy vs. 14 Gy, P < 0.01). Conclusion: SBPT and SBXT can be used to simulate an HDR-B boost for locally advanced prostate cancer. SBPT demonstrated greater dose escalation potential than SBXT. These results are relevant for future trial design, particularly in patients with high risk prostate cancer who are not amenable to brachytherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric feasibility of moderately hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer with intensity-modulated proton beam therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMPT) and impact of hydrogel prostate-rectum spacer
    Dalia Ahmad Khalil
    Danny Jazmati
    Dirk Geismar
    Jörg Wulff
    Christian Bäumer
    Paul Heinz Kramer
    Theresa Steinmeier
    Stefanie Schulze Schleitthoff
    Sandija Plaude
    Martin Bischoff
    Stephan Tschirdewahn
    Boris Hadaschik
    Beate Timmermann
    Radiation Oncology, 17
  • [32] A Pilot Study of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy with Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Boost in the Treatment of Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Oermann, Eric K.
    Slack, Rebecca S.
    Hanscom, Heather N.
    Lei, Sue
    Suy, Simeng
    Park, Hyeon U.
    Kim, Joy S.
    Sherer, Benjamin A.
    Collins, Brian T.
    Satinsky, Andrew N.
    Harter, K. William
    Batipps, Gerald P.
    Constantinople, Nicholas L.
    Dejter, Stephen W.
    Maxted, William C.
    Regan, James B.
    Pahira, John J.
    McGeagh, Kevin G.
    Jha, Reena C.
    Dawson, Nancy A.
    Dritschilo, Anatoly
    Lynch, John H.
    Collins, Sean P.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2010, 9 (05) : 453 - 462
  • [33] Proton beams in cancer treatments: Clinical outcomes and dosimetric comparisons with photon therapy
    Doyen, Jerome
    Falk, Alexander Tuan
    Floquet, Vincent
    Herault, Joel
    Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2016, 43 : 104 - 112
  • [34] MRI targeted single fraction HDR Brachytherapy for localized Prostate Carcinoma: a feasibility study of focal radiation therapy (ProFocAL)
    Fischbach, Frank
    Hass, Peter
    Schindele, Daniel
    Genseke, Philipp
    Geisendorf, Lisa
    Stehning, Christian
    Schostak, Martin
    Brunner, Thomas
    Pech, Maciej
    Fischbach, Katharina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) : 2072 - 2081
  • [35] Focal HDR brachytherapy boost to stereotactic radiotherapy (fBTsRT) for prostate cancer: a phase II randomized controlled trial
    Belliveau, C.
    Barkati, M.
    Delouya, G.
    Taussky, D.
    Beauchemin, M. C.
    Lambert, C.
    Beaulieu, L.
    Beliveau-Nadeau, D.
    Nicolas, B.
    Carrier, J. F.
    Vigneault, E.
    Menard, C.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [36] Focal HDR brachytherapy boost to stereotactic radiotherapy (fBTsRT) for prostate cancer: a phase II randomized controlled trial
    C. Belliveau
    M. Barkati
    G. Delouya
    D. Taussky
    M. C. Beauchemin
    C. Lambert
    L. Beaulieu
    D. Beliveau-Nadeau
    B. Nicolas
    J. F. Carrier
    E. Vigneault
    C. Ménard
    Radiation Oncology, 17
  • [37] Proton Versus CyberKnife Therapy Planning for Hypofractionated Treatment of Prostate With Focal Boost
    Yeo, Inhwan
    Goughenour, Alexander
    Cernica, George
    Nie, Wei
    Joo, Mindy
    Wang, Peng
    Fan, Jiajin
    Parniani, Ashkan
    Kanani, Samir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2024, 14
  • [38] Dosimetric benefits of hemigland stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Park, Sang J.
    King, Christopher R.
    Roberts, Kristofer
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1056)
  • [39] Dosimetric advantages of proton therapy compared with photon therapy using an adaptive strategy in cervical cancer
    van de Schoot, Agustinus J. A. J.
    de Boer, Peter
    Crama, Koen F.
    Visser, Jorrit
    Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
    Rasch, Coen R. N.
    Bel, Arjan
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (07) : 892 - 899
  • [40] Is an Endorectal Balloon Beneficial for Rectal Sparing after Spacer Implantation in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Proton Beam Therapy? A Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison Study
    Ahmad Khalil, Dalia
    Wulff, Joerg
    Jazmati, Danny
    Geismar, Dirk
    Baumer, Christian
    Kramer, Paul-Heinz
    Steinmeier, Theresa
    Schleithoff, Stefanie Schulze
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Timmermann, Beate
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 758 - 768