Simulation of an HDR "Boost" with Stereotactic Proton versus Photon Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Feasibility Study

被引:0
|
作者
Remick, Jill S. [1 ]
Sabouri, Pouya [2 ]
Zhu, Mingyao [2 ,3 ]
Bentzen, Soren M. [2 ]
Sun, Kai [2 ]
Kwok, Young [2 ]
Kaiser, Adeel [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Miami Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
prostate cancer; brachytherapy; stereotactic radiation therapy; proton therapy; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ASCENDE-RT; UNCERTAINTIES; ESCALATION; ALPHA/BETA; TOXICITY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-20-00029.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objectives: To compare the dose escalation potential of stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) versus stereotactic body photon therapy (SBXT) using high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-B) dose-prescription metrics. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients previously treated with radiation for prostate cancer were identified and stratified by prostate size (<= 50cc; n = 13, > 50cc; n = 12). Initial CT simulation scans were re-planned using SBXT and SBPT modalities using a prescription dose of 19Gy in 2 fractions. Target coverage goals were designed to mimic the dose distributions of HDR-B and maximized to the upper limit constraint for the rectum and urethra. Dosimetric parameters between SBPT and SBXT were compared using the signed-rank test and again after stratification for prostate size (<= 50cm(3) and >50cm(3)) using the Wilcoxon rank test. Results: Prostate volume receiving 100% of the dose (V100) was significantly greater for SBXT (99%) versus SBPT (96%) (P <= 0.01), whereas the median V125 (82% vs. 73%, P < 0.01) and V200 (12% vs. 2%, P < 0.01) was significantly greater for SBPT compared to SBXT. Median V150 was 49% for both cohorts (P = 0.92). V125 and V200 were significantly correlated with prostate size. For prostates > 50cm(3), V200 was significantly greater with SBPT compared to SBXT (14.5% vs. 1%, P = 0.005), but not for prostates 50cm(3) (9% vs 4%, P = 0.11). Median dose to 2cm(3) of the bladder neck was significantly lower with SBPT versus SBXT (9.6 Gy vs. 14 Gy, P < 0.01). Conclusion: SBPT and SBXT can be used to simulate an HDR-B boost for locally advanced prostate cancer. SBPT demonstrated greater dose escalation potential than SBXT. These results are relevant for future trial design, particularly in patients with high risk prostate cancer who are not amenable to brachytherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Dosimetric Features of Ultra-Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Gao, Robert W.
    Ma, Jiasen
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Kruse, Jon J.
    Stish, Bradley J.
    Kowalchuk, Roman O.
    McMenomy, Brendan P.
    Waddle, Mark R.
    Phillips, Ryan M.
    Choo, Richard
    Davis, Brian J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2024, 12
  • [12] Dosimetric effects of the supine and prone positions in proton therapy for prostate cancer
    Kato, Takahiro
    Kato, Masato
    Takemasa, Kimihiro
    Murakami, Masao
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 47 (04) : 331 - 335
  • [13] Brachytherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Boost: A Dosimetric Comparison
    Dahbi, Zineb
    Fadila, Kouhen
    Vinh-Hung, Vincent
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [14] Hydrogel Spacer Reduces Rectal Dose during Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Analysis
    Polamraju, Praveen
    Bagley, Alexander F.
    Williamson, Tyler
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Frank, Steven J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2019, 5 (04): : 23 - 31
  • [15] Phase II feasibility study of high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer using proton boost therapy: First clinical trial of proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan
    Nihei, K
    Ogino, T
    Ishikura, S
    Kawashima, M
    Nishimura, H
    Arahira, S
    Onozawa, M
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 35 (12) : 745 - 752
  • [16] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on 3-Year Toxicity
    Paydar, Ima
    Pepin, Abigail
    Cyr, Robyn A.
    King, Joseph
    Yung, Thomas M.
    Bullock, ElizabethG.
    Lei, Siyuan
    Satinsky, Andrew
    Harter, K. William
    Suy, Simeng
    Dritschilo, Anatoly
    Lynch, John H.
    Kole, Thomas P.
    Collins, Sean P.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [17] Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Therapy and Proton Therapy in Prostate Cancer Using the Monte Carlo Simulation Platform GEANT4
    Ismail Ghazi
    Zineb Sobhy
    Mustapha Krim
    Othmane Kaanouch
    Meriem Tantaoui
    Abdelkrim Kartouni
    Jamal Inchaouh
    Hamid Chakir
    Said Ouaskit
    Moscow University Physics Bulletin, 2021, 76 : 326 - 332
  • [18] Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Therapy and Proton Therapy in Prostate Cancer Using the Monte Carlo Simulation Platform GEANT4
    Ghazi, Ismail
    Sobhy, Zineb
    Krim, Mustapha
    Kaanouch, Othmane
    Tantaoui, Meriem
    Kartouni, Abdelkrim
    Inchaouh, Jamal
    Chakir, Hamid
    Ouaskit, Said
    MOSCOW UNIVERSITY PHYSICS BULLETIN, 2021, 76 (05) : 326 - 332
  • [19] Simultaneous integrated boost with stereotactic radiotherapy for dominant intraprostatic lesion of localized prostate cancer: a dosimetric planning study
    Kim, Yeon Joo
    Yoon, Kyoung Jun
    Kim, Young Seok
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [20] Feasibility of transrectal and transperineal fiducial marker placement for prostate cancer before proton therapy
    Ohta, Kengo
    Ogino, Hiroyuki
    Iwata, Hiromitsu
    Hashimoto, Shingo
    Hattori, Yukiko
    Nakajima, Koichiro
    Yamada, Maho
    Shimohira, Masashi
    Mizoe, Jun-Etsu
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 51 (02) : 258 - 263