Measurements and modelling of free-surface turbulent flows induced by a magnetic stirrer in an unbaffled stirred tank reactor

被引:70
作者
Mahmud, Tariq [1 ]
Haque, Jennifer N. [1 ]
Roberts, Kevin J. [1 ]
Rhodes, Dominic [2 ]
Wilkinson, Derek [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Particle Sci & Engn, Sch Proc Environm & Mat Engn, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Natl Nucl Lab Ltd, Sellafield CA20 1PG, Seascale, England
[3] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Engn & Phys Sci, Ctr Mol & Interface Engn, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Free-surface flow; Vortex; CFD for free-surface flow; Volume-of-fluid; Unbaffled agitated vessel; Hydrodynamics; Magnetic stirrer mixing; Nuclear fuel reprocessing; RUSHTON TURBINE; LDA MEASUREMENTS; CFD PREDICTIONS; VESSELS; IMPELLER; SIMULATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.059
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Measurements and numerical simulations of turbulent flows with free-surface vortex in an unbaffled reactor agitated by a cylindrical magnetic stirrer are presented. Measurements of the three mean and fluctuating components of the velocity vector are made using a laser Doppler velocimetry in order to characterise the flow field at different speeds of the stirrer. A homogeneous Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase flow model coupled with a volume-of-fluid method for interface capturing is applied to determine the vortex shape and to compute the turbulent flow field in the reactor. Turbulence is modelled using a second-moment differential Reynolds-stress transport (RST) model, but for some cases the k-epsilon/k-omega based shear-stress transport (SST) model is also used. The predictions obtained using the ANSYS CFX-5.7 computational fluid dynamics code are compared with the images of the vortex and the measured distributions of mean axial, radial and tangential velocities and turbulent kinetic energy. The predicted general shape of the liquid free-surface is in good agreement with measurements, but the vortex depth is underpredicted. The overall agreement between the measured and the predicted axial and tangential velocities obtained with the RST model is good. However, the radial velocity is significantly underpredicted. Predictions of the turbulent kinetic energy yield reasonably good agreement with measurements in the bulk flow region, but discrepancy exists near the reactor wall where this quantity is underpredicted. The SST model predictions are generally of the same quality as those of the RST model, with the latter model providing better predictions of the tangential velocity distribution. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4197 / 4209
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in an unbaffled stirred tank driven by a Rushton turbine [J].
Alcamo, R ;
Micale, G ;
Grisafi, F ;
Brucato, A ;
Ciofalo, M .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (8-9) :2303-2316
[2]   CFD analysis of turbulence non-homogeneity in mixing vessels - A two-compartment model [J].
Alexopoulos, AH ;
Maggioris, D ;
Kiparissides, C .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2002, 57 (10) :1735-1752
[3]  
*ANSYS, 2004, CFX 5 7 US MAN
[4]  
ARMENANTE P, 1994, ICHEME S SER, V136, P349
[5]   Velocity profiles in a closed, unbaffled vessel: comparison between experimental LDV data and numerical CFD predictions [J].
Armenante, PM ;
Luo, CG ;
Chou, CC ;
Fort, I ;
Medek, J .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1997, 52 (20) :3483-3492
[6]   Macro- and micromixing studies in an unbaffled vessel agitated by a Rushton turbine [J].
Assirelli, Melissa ;
Bujalski, Waldemar ;
Eaglesham, Archie ;
Nienow, Alvin W. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2008, 63 (01) :35-46
[7]  
Barth T.J., 1989, 27 AEROSPACE SCI M
[8]  
BATTELLO G, 2003, FLOW FIELD UNBAFFLED
[9]   Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches [J].
Brucato, A ;
Ciofalo, M ;
Grisafi, F ;
Micale, G .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1998, 53 (21) :3653-3684
[10]  
BRUNAZZI E, 2003, ICHEAP63, P1487