The Role of "No Net Loss'' Policies in Conserving Biodiversity Threatened by the Global Infrastructure Boom

被引:68
作者
zu Ermgassen, Sophus Olav Sven Emil [1 ]
Utamiputri, Pratiwi [2 ,3 ]
Bennun, Leon [3 ,4 ]
Edwards, Stephen [5 ]
Bull, Joseph William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Sch Anthropol & Conservat, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury, Kent, England
[2] Biodivers Consultancy, WIMO Bldg,Jl Kemang 7, Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Biodivers Consultancy, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge, England
[5] Int Union Conservat Nat, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
来源
ONE EARTH | 2019年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; MITIGATION HIERARCHY; OFFSETS; CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPES; CHALLENGES; ROADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over US$60 trillion is predicted to be spent on new infrastructure globally by 2040. Is it possible to meet UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9 (develop infrastructure networks) without sacrificing goals 14 and 15 (ending biodiversity loss)? We explore the potential role of "no net loss'' (NNL) policies in reconciling these SDGs. We assess country-level overlaps between planned infrastructure expansion, infrastructure-threatened biodiversity, and national biodiversity compensation policies and find that around half of predicted infrastructure and infrastructure-threat-ened biodiversity falls within countries with some form of mandatory compensation policy. However, these policies currently have shortcomings, are unlikely to achieve NNL in biodiversity, and could risk doing more harm than good. We summarize policy transformations required for NNL policies to mitigate all infrastructure impacts on biodiversity. To achieve SDGs 9 alongside 14 and 15, capitalizing on the global coverage of mandatory compensation policies and rapidly transforming them into robust NNL policies (emphasizing impact avoidance) should be an urgent priority.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 315
页数:11
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Agenor P.-R., 2006, Public infrastructure and growth: new channels and policy implications
[2]   High-risk infrastructure projects pose imminent threats to forests in Indonesian Borneo [J].
Alamgir, Mohammed ;
Campbell, Mason J. ;
Sloan, Sean ;
Suhardiman, Ali ;
Supriatna, Jatna ;
Laurance, William F. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GLOB INFR OUTL INFR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ALL POL REV
[5]   Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: refraning nature to save it [J].
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia ;
Adams, William M. .
ORYX, 2017, 51 (01) :23-31
[6]   A Global Mitigation Hierarchy for Nature Conservation [J].
Arlidge, William N. S. ;
Bull, Joseph W. ;
Addison, Prue F. E. ;
Burgass, Michael J. ;
Gianuca, Dimas ;
Gorham, Taylor M. ;
Jacob, Celine ;
Shumway, Nicole ;
Sinclair, Samuel P. ;
Watson, James E. M. ;
Wilcox, Chris ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2018, 68 (05) :336-347
[7]  
Arts Jos, 2012, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, V14, DOI 10.1142/S1464333212500251
[8]   Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative [J].
Ascensao, Fernando ;
Fahrig, Lenore ;
Clevenger, Anthony P. ;
Corlett, Richard T. ;
Jaeger, Jochen A. G. ;
Laurance, William F. ;
Pereira, Henrique M. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (05) :206-209
[9]  
Baker J., 2019, Biodiversity Net Gain: good practice principles for development - a practical guide
[10]   Improving marine biodiversity offsetting: A proposed methodology for better assessing losses and gains [J].
Bas, Adeline ;
Jacob, Celine ;
Hay, Julien ;
Pioch, Sylvain ;
Thorin, Sebastien .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 175 :46-59