Program Performance and Multiple Constituency Theory

被引:28
作者
Campbell, David A. [1 ]
Lambright, Kristina T. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Coll Community & Publ Affairs, Dept Publ Adm, POB 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
accountability; performance measurement; effectiveness; nonprofit-funder relations; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS; ACCOUNTABILITY; FUNDERS; MOTIVATIONS; GOVERNMENT; PROVIDERS;
D O I
10.1177/0899764014564578
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This article seeks to deepen our understanding of performance measurement in the nonprofit human services sector by investigating issues related to funder and provider motivations for collecting and analyzing program-level performance information. Using survey and interview data from nonprofit human service organizations and their funders (nonprofit and local government), we analyze this study's research questions through the lens of multiple constituency theory. Consistent with multiple constituency theory, the study found similarities and differences in funder and provider motivations for collecting performance information. The study also indicates that other key constituents (such as service beneficiaries, donors to nonprofit organizations, and other levels of government that provide resources to local governments) play a role in defining program performance. The article suggests that multiple constituency theory applies to program-level performance and that understanding program performance requires considering the perspectives of multiple stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 171
页数:22
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Addicott R., 2006, PUBLIC SERVICE PERFO, P14
[2]  
Andrews R., 2006, PUBLIC SERVICE PERFO, P14
[3]  
Balser Deborah., 2005, NONPROFIT MANAG LEAD, V15, P295, DOI DOI 10.1002/NML.70
[4]   Account space: How accountability requirements shape nonprofit practice [J].
Benjamin, Lehn M. .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2008, 37 (02) :201-223
[5]   Nonprofit Organizations and Outcome Measurement: From Tracking Program Activities to Focusing on Frontline Work [J].
Benjamin, Lehn M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2012, 33 (03) :431-447
[6]   Funders as Principals Performance Measurement in Philanthropic Relationships [J].
Benjamin, Lehn M. .
NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP, 2010, 20 (04) :383-403
[7]  
Benjamin LM., 2014, Stanford Social Innovation Review, V12, P42
[8]  
Bonbright D., 2009, The 21st century potential of constituency voice: Opportunities for reform in the United States human services sector
[9]   ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND MULTIPLE CONSTITUENCIES [J].
BOSCHKEN, HL .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1994, 54 (03) :308-312