Degree choice evidence from stated preferences

被引:1
作者
Artabe, Alaitz [1 ]
Gardeazabal, Javier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Avda Lehendakari Agirre 83, Bilbao 48015, Spain
关键词
Degree choice; Discrete choice; Stated preferences; Degree attributes; COLLEGE MAJOR; LOGIT MODEL; UNIVERSITY; EDUCATION; EARNINGS; ABILITY; DEMAND; GENDER; MATTER; CHOOSE;
D O I
10.1007/s00181-016-1121-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the factors driving the choice of university degree or college major. Previous research shows that students choose the degree/major that reports them the maximum utility level. This evidence relies on data from revealed preferences, implicitly assuming that the degree/major a student pursues is the student's preferred degree. However, numerus clausus and other restrictions can condition the choice of major. Under these restrictions, the revealed choice is not necessarily the alternative that maximizes utility. We analyze data from pre-enrollment student-stated preferences regarding degrees within a natural field choice experiment setting. Our findings are in line with the rational choice results obtained in the literature, thus contributing external validity in a previously unexplored setting. In addition, we also contribute a discrete choice modeling strategy and estimation method. The discrete choice model accounts for individual characteristics, degree attributes and their interaction in an specification that is as general as discrete choice models used in the literature. The estimation method can handle cases where the number of alternatives and individual observations is large while other methods are unfeasible.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1234
页数:30
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Higher education demand in Spain: The influence of labour market signals and family background [J].
Albert, C .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2000, 40 (02) :147-162
[2]   Heterogeneity in Human Capital Investments: High School Curriculum, College Major, and Careers [J].
Altonji, Joseph G. ;
Blom, Erica ;
Meghir, Costas .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 :185-223
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[4]   Ability sorting and the returns to college major [J].
Arcidiacono, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2004, 121 (1-2) :343-375
[5]   Modeling college major choices using elicited measures of expectations and counterfactuals [J].
Arcidiacono, Peter ;
Hotz, V. Joseph ;
Kang, Songman .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2012, 166 (01) :3-16
[6]   Women and men go to university: Mathematical background and gender differences in choice of field in higher education [J].
Ayalon, H .
SEX ROLES, 2003, 48 (5-6) :277-290
[7]   College major choice and ability: Why is general ability not enough? [J].
Bartolj, Tjasa ;
Polanec, Saso .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2012, 31 (06) :996-1016
[8]   CHOOSING THE FIELD OF STUDY IN POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION: DO EXPECTED EARNINGS MATTER? [J].
Beffy, Magali ;
Fougere, Denis ;
Maurel, Arnaud .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 94 (01) :334-347
[9]   PREDICTED FUTURE EARNINGS AND CHOICE OF COLLEGE MAJOR [J].
BERGER, MC .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1988, 41 (03) :418-429
[10]   AUTOMOBILE PRICES IN MARKET EQUILIBRIUM [J].
BERRY, S ;
LEVINSOHN, J ;
PAKES, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1995, 63 (04) :841-890