Predictive value of early motor evaluation in preterm very low birth weight and term small for gestational age children

被引:33
作者
Evensen, Kari Anne I. [1 ,2 ]
Skranes, Jon [1 ,3 ]
Brubakk, Ann-Mari [1 ,3 ]
Vik, Torstein [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Dept Lab Med Childrens & Womens Hlth, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway
[2] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Trondheim, Norway
[3] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Bayley scales of infant development; Motor problems; Movement ABC; Peabody developmental motor scales; Small for gestational age; Very low birth weight; FOLLOW-UP; PERCEPTUAL-MOTOR; RISK-FACTORS; INFANTS; ADOLESCENTS; PERFORMANCE; BORN; IMPAIRMENT; GROWTH; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.04.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Motor problems are common in children born preterm or small for gestational age. Aim: To study the predictive value of early motor assessments for later motor skills. Subjects: Twenty-eight children born preterm with very low birth weight (VLBW: birth weight <= 1500 g) 57 children born small for gestational age (SGA: birth weight <10th centile) at term and 77 term-born controls with normal birth weight. Methods: The psychomotor development index (PDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development was used as a measure of motor skills at age one, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS) at age five and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (Movement ABC) at age 14. Low/borderline low scores were defined as < - 25D/- 1SD (PDI) or <5th/15th centile (PDMS; Movement ABC). Results: In the VLBW group, motor problems in adolescence were identified both by low PDI (sensitivity: 0.80; 95%CI:0.38-0.96) and PDMS scores (sensitivity: 0.83; 95%CI:0.44-0.97). In the SGA and the control group sensitivity was poor for low PDI and moderate for low PDMS scores. However, in the SGA group. sensitivity increased when borderline low PDMS scores were used as cut-off (sensitivity: 0.75; 95%CI:0.41-0.93). Specificity of PDI and PDMS was high in all three groups. Conclusions: Both PDI and PDMS may be valuable tools for early identification of motor problems in VLBW children. whereas PDMS best predicted motor problems in the two other groups. In all three groups, a normal motor examination at 1 and 5 years was highly predictive of normal motor skills at age 14. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 518
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Altman D, 2000, STAT CONFIDENCE CONF
[2]  
Amiel-Tison C., 2000, Neurological Development from Birth to Six Years. Guide for Examination and Evaluation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Arch Dis Child, V67, P675
[4]  
Bayley N., 1969, BAYLEY SCALES INFANT
[5]  
Bruininks R.H., 1978, MANUAL BRUININKS OSE
[6]   CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF THE TEST OF INFANT MOTOR-PERFORMANCE [J].
CAMPBELL, SK ;
KOLOBE, THA ;
OSTEN, ET ;
LENKE, M ;
GIROLAMI, GL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (07) :585-596
[7]  
Campos Denise, 2008, Pediatr Phys Ther, V20, P340, DOI 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31818a0f78
[8]   Cranial magnetic resonance imaging and school performance in very low birth weight infants in adolescence [J].
Cooke, RWI ;
Abernethy, LJ .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 1999, 81 (02) :F116-F121
[9]   Growth impairment in the very preterm and cognitive and motor performance at 7 years [J].
Cooke, RWI ;
Foulder-Hughes, L .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2003, 88 (06) :482-487
[10]  
Darrah J, 1998, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V40, P485