The measurement of actual acidity in acid sulfate soils and the determination of sulfidic acidity in suspension after peroxide oxidation

被引:19
作者
McElnea, AE [1 ]
Ahern, CR
Menzies, NW
机构
[1] Queensland Dept Nat Resources & Mines QASSIT, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Land & Food Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH | 2002年 / 40卷 / 07期
关键词
titratable peroxide acidity; titratable actual acidity; jarosite; suspension titration; BaCl2 actual acidity;
D O I
10.1071/SR01118
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Improvements to the routine methods for the determination of actual acidity in suspension for acid sulfate soils (ASS) are introduced. The titratable sulfidic acidity (TSA) results using an improved peroxide-based method were compared with the theoretical acidity predicted by the chromium reducible sulfur method for 9 acid sulfate soils. The regression between these 2 measures of sulfidic acidity was highly significant, the slope of the regression line not significantly different from unity (P = 0.05) and the intercept not significantly different from zero. This contrasts with results of other workers using earlier peroxide oxidation methods, where TSA substantially underestimated the theoretical acidity predicted by reduced inorganic sulfur analysis. Comparison was made between the 2 principal measurements from the improved peroxide method (TSA and S-POS), with S-POS converted to theoretical sulfidic acidity to allow comparison. The relationship between these 2 measurements was highly significant. The effects of titration in suspension, as well as raising titration end points to pH 6.5, were investigated, principally with respect to the titratable actual acidity (TAA) result. TAA results obtained by KCl extraction were compared with those obtained using BaCl2, MgCl2, and water extraction. TAA in 1 M KCl suspensions titrated to pH 6.5 agreed well with titratable actual acidity measured using the 25-h extraction approach of the Lin et al. (2000a) BaCl2 method. Both BaCl2 and KCl solutions were ineffective at fully recovering acidity from synthetic jarosite without repeated extraction and titration. The application of correction factors for the estimation of total actual acidity in ASS is not supported by the results of this investigation. Acid sulfate soils that contain substantial quantities of jarosite or other acid-producing but relatively insoluble sulfate minerals continue to prove problematic to chemically analyse; however, an approach for estimating this component is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1157
页数:25
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   BASALUMINITE AND ALUNITE - POSSIBLE CAUSE OF SULFATE RETENTION BY ACID SOILS [J].
ADAMS, F ;
RAWAJFIH, Z .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (04) :686-692
[2]  
Ahern C. R., 1996, Proceedings 2nd National Conference on Acid Sulfate Soils, Coffs Harbour, Australia, 5-6 September 1996., P82
[3]  
Ahern C. R., 1998, ACID SULFATE SOILS L
[4]  
AHERN CR, 2000, ACID SULFATE SOILS E
[5]   LIME REQUIREMENT OF ACIDIC QUEENSLAND SOILS .2. COMPARISON OF LABORATORY METHODS FOR PREDICTING LIME REQUIREMENT [J].
AITKEN, RL ;
MOODY, PW ;
MCKINLEY, PG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1990, 28 (05) :703-715
[6]   THE EFFECT OF VALENCE AND IONIC-STRENGTH ON THE MEASUREMENT OF PH BUFFER CAPACITY [J].
AITKEN, RL ;
MOODY, PW .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1994, 32 (05) :975-984
[7]  
AITKEN RL, 1995, PLANT SOIL INTERACTI
[8]   SIGNIFICANCE OF KC1-EXTRACTABLE A1(III) AS AN INDEX TO LIME REQUIREMENT OF SOILS OF HUMID TROPICS [J].
AMEDEE, G ;
PEECH, M .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1976, 121 (04) :227-233
[9]  
ANZECC (Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council), 2000, AUSTR NEW ZEAL GUID
[10]   THE BASIC ALUMINIUM SULPHATES [J].
BASSETT, H ;
GOODWIN, TH .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1949, (SEP) :2239-2279