Validation of a breast cancer nomogram to predict lymphedema in a Chinese population

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Xiaoping [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Hui [3 ]
Lin, Qimou [2 ]
Yu, Qihe [2 ]
Zhou, Yi [2 ]
Long, Wansheng [2 ]
Wang, Ningxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Dept Breast Surg, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangmen Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Jiangmen, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangmen Matern & Child Hlth Care Populat & Famil, Dept Breast Surg, Jiangmen, Peoples R China
关键词
Lymphedema; Breast cancer; Axillary lymph node dissection; Nomogram; ARM LYMPHEDEMA; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; AXILLARY DISSECTION; NODE METASTASIS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; SURGERY; WOMEN; SURVIVORS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Upper arm lymphedema (LE) is a common complication after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients. This retrospective cohort study aimed to validate a published nomogram to predict the risk of LE in the Chinese breast cancer patients. Methods: A total of 409 breast cancer patients who underwent breast cancer surgery and ALND (level I and II) were identified. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for LE. The nomogram predictive of LE of breast cancer was evaluated by receiver-operating curve analysis, calibration plots, and Kaplan-Meier analysis in our study population. Results: With a median follow-up of 68 months, the 5-year cumulative incidence of LE was 22.3%. Higher body mass index (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.13), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 3.76, 95% CI: 2.29-6.20), larger extend of axillary surgery (level I/II/III versus level I/II: HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.30-4.37), and radiotherapy (HR = 4.90, 95% CI: 1.90-12.5) were independently associated with LE. The AUC value of the nomogram was 0.706 (95% CI: 0.648-0.752). A high-risk subgroup of patients defined by nomogram had significantly higher cumulative risk of LE than those in the low-risk subgroups (P < 0.01). The calibration plots revealed that the nomogram was well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.0634). Conclusions: The nomogram to predict the risk of LE in breast cancer patients with ALND has been validated to be discriminative and accurate. More studies are needed to evaluate the impact of other factors (lifestyle, behaviors, and so forth) on the performance of the nomogram. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 138
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A scoring system for predicting the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema
    Li, Fenglian
    Lu, Qian
    Jin, Sanli
    Zhao, Quanping
    Qin, Xueying
    Jin, Shuai
    Zhang, Lichuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2020, 7 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [42] Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: A review
    Taghian, Nadine R.
    Miller, Cynthia L.
    Jamrnallo, Lauren S.
    O'Toole, Jean
    Skolny, Melissa N.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2014, 92 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [43] Development and validation of a risk prediction model for breast cancer-related lymphedema in postoperative patients with breast cancer
    Li, Miao-miao
    Wu, Pei-pei
    Qiang, Wan-min
    Li, Jia-qian
    Zhu, Ming-yu
    Yang, Xiao-lin
    Wang, Ying
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 63
  • [44] Lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer: A new approach to an old problem
    O'Toole, Jean
    Jammallo, Lauren S.
    Skolny, Melissa N.
    Miller, Cynthia L.
    Elliott, Krista
    Specht, Michelle C.
    Taghian, Alphonse G.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 88 (02) : 437 - 446
  • [45] Acupuncture for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial
    Bao, Ting
    Zhi, Wanqing Iris
    Vertosick, Emily A.
    Li, Qing Susan
    DeRito, Janice
    Vickers, Andrew
    Cassileth, Barrie R.
    Mao, Jun J.
    Van Zee, Kimberly J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 170 (01) : 77 - 87
  • [46] Validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of lymphedema following contemporary treatment for breast cancer: a large multi-institutional study (KROG 20-05)
    Hwa Kyung Byun
    Jae Sik Kim
    Jee Suk Chang
    Yeona Cho
    Sung-Ja Ahn
    Jung Han Yoon
    Haeyoung Kim
    Nalee Kim
    Euncheol Choi
    Hyeli Park
    Kyubo Kim
    Shin-Hyung Park
    Chai Hong Rim
    Hoon Sik Choi
    Yoon Kyeong Oh
    Ik Jae Lee
    Kyung Hwan Shin
    Yong Bae Kim
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2022, 192 : 553 - 561
  • [47] Construction and validation of prognostic nomogram for metaplastic breast cancer
    Li, Yongfeng
    Chen, Daobao
    Xuan, Haojun
    Dragomir, Mihnea P.
    Calin, George A.
    Meng, Xuli
    Chen, Meng
    Jin, Hongchuan
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 22 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [48] Transcription Factor Profiling to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival in Breast Cancer: Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Optimize Clinical Management
    Chen, Hengyu
    Ma, Xianxiong
    Yang, Ming
    Wang, Mengyi
    Li, Lei
    Huang, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [49] Nomogram to Predict Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes Metastasis in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Xie, Xinhua
    Xiong, Zhenchong
    Li, Xing
    Huang, Xiaojia
    Ye, Feng
    Tang, Hailin
    Xie, Xiaoming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [50] Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for breast cancer patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy and surgery: a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database and two Chinese cohorts
    Wang, Huan
    Xia, Guang-Fa
    Zhang, Zi-Ran
    Luo, Xi
    Zhu, Juan-Ying
    Wang, Hui-Ke
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (11): : 5065 - 5081