Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities

被引:359
作者
Peres-Neto, Pedro R. [1 ]
Legendre, Pierre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2010年 / 19卷 / 02期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Community analysis; eigenvector maps; model selection; spatial autocorrelation; spatial correlation; spatial predictors; variation partitioning; SPECIES RICHNESS; BETA DIVERSITY; AUTOCORRELATION; SELECTION; INFERENCE; MATRICES; PATTERN; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00506.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim Variation partitioning based on canonical analysis is the most commonly used analysis to investigate community patterns according to environmental and spatial predictors. Ecologists use this method in order to understand the pure contribution of the environment independent of space, and vice versa, as well as to control for inflated type I error in assessing the environmental component under spatial autocorrelation. Our goal is to use numerical simulations to compare how different spatial predictors and model selection procedures perform in assessing the importance of the spatial component and in controlling for type I error while testing environmental predictors. Innovation We determine for the first time how the ability of commonly used (polynomial regressors) and novel methods based on eigenvector maps compare in the realm of spatial variation partitioning. We introduce a novel forward selection procedure to select spatial regressors for community analysis. Finally, we point out a number of issues that have not been previously considered about the joint explained variation between environment and space, which should be taken into account when reporting and testing the unique contributions of environment and space in patterning ecological communities. Main conclusions In tests of species-environment relationships, spatial autocorrelation is known to inflate the level of type I error and make the tests of significance invalid. First, one must determine if the spatial component is significant using all spatial predictors (Moran's eigenvector maps). If it is, consider a model selection for the set of spatial predictors (an individual-species forward selection procedure is to be preferred) and use the environmental and selected spatial predictors in a partial regression or partial canonical analysis scheme. This is an effective way of controlling for type I error in such tests. Polynomial regressors do not provide tests with a correct level of type I error.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 184
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Partitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components in a multivariate data set
    Anderson, MJ
    Gribble, NA
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1998, 23 (02): : 158 - 167
  • [2] Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes
    Bender, DJ
    Tischendorf, L
    Fahrig, L
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2003, 18 (01) : 17 - 39
  • [3] Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression
    Bini, L. Mauricio
    Diniz-Filho, J. Alexandre F.
    Rangel, Thiago F. L. V. B.
    Akre, Thomas S. B.
    Albaladejo, Rafael G.
    Albuquerque, Fabio S.
    Aparicio, Abelardo
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    Baselga, Andres
    Beck, Jan
    Isabel Bellocq, M.
    Boehning-Gaese, Katrin
    Borges, Paulo A. V.
    Castro-Parga, Isabel
    Chey, Vun Khen
    Chown, Steven L.
    de Marco, Paulo, Jr.
    Dobkin, David S.
    Ferrer-Castan, Dolores
    Field, Richard
    Filloy, Julieta
    Fleishman, Erica
    Gomez, Jose F.
    Hortal, Joaquin
    Iverson, John B.
    Kerr, Jeremy T.
    Kissling, W. Daniel
    Kitching, Ian J.
    Leon-Cortes, Jorge L.
    Lobo, Jorge M.
    Montoya, Daniel
    Morales-Castilla, Ignacio
    Moreno, Juan C.
    Oberdorff, Thierry
    Olalla-Tarraga, Miguel A.
    Pausas, Juli G.
    Qian, Hong
    Rahbek, Carsten
    Rodriguez, Miguel A.
    Rueda, Marta
    Ruggiero, Adriana
    Sackmann, Paula
    Sanders, Nathan J.
    Terribile, Levi Carina
    Vetaas, Ole R.
    Hawkins, Bradford A.
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2009, 32 (02) : 193 - 204
  • [4] Bivand R., 1980, QUAEST GEOGR, V6, P5
  • [5] Forward selection of explanatory variables
    Blanchet, F. Guillaume
    Legendre, Pierre
    Borcard, Daniel
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2008, 89 (09) : 2623 - 2632
  • [6] All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices
    Borcard, D
    Legendre, P
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 153 (1-2) : 51 - 68
  • [7] Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales
    Borcard, D
    Legendre, P
    Avois-Jacquet, C
    Tuomisto, H
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (07) : 1826 - 1832
  • [8] PARTIALLING OUT THE SPATIAL COMPONENT OF ECOLOGICAL VARIATION
    BORCARD, D
    LEGENDRE, P
    DRAPEAU, P
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (03) : 1045 - 1055
  • [9] Elicitation by design in ecology: using expert opinion to inform priors for Bayesian statistical models
    Choy, Samantha Low
    O'Leary, Rebecca
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2009, 90 (01) : 265 - 277
  • [10] Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics
    Cottenie, K
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (11) : 1175 - 1182