Application of life cycle carbon assessment for a sustainable building design: a case study in the UK

被引:22
作者
Brooks, Maria [1 ]
Abdellatif, Mawada [1 ]
Alkhaddar, Rafid [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
Building; embodied carbon; carbon life cycle; low carbon; operational carbon;
D O I
10.1080/15435075.2020.1865360
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In the construction industry, a large amount of carbon dioxide is emitted, due to the embodied and operational carbon. RICS Guidance note shows the stages producing the most carbon dioxide is the operational stage and the second significant area is the production stage. Recent studies have investigated reducing the operational emissions, however there is limited research on the embodied carbon. To achieve climate targets by 2050, all operational emissions need to be phased out along with reductions in embodied carbon. This paper aims to analyze the carbon life cycle (LCA) of the case study building in the UK. Further implementing low carbon & clean technologies have been considered to reduce the embodied and operational carbon. Current state of the art carbon assessment is utilized incorporating methodologies such as `Cradle to grave' from `British standards' in conjunction with `RICS Guidance note' and `RICS Professional statement.' To measure the embodied and operational carbon using the `cradle to grave' process, requires selecting a case study building and collecting related input data to process calculations such as construction materials and energy consumption. Results conclude that the operational stage is the largest CO2 contributor of the whole lifecycle, therefore PV Solar panels were chosen to reduce CO2 emissions. The product stage was the second most significant CO2 contributor therefore low carbon strategies, such as use of recycled steel, light weight brick, and SCM's for mortar and concrete, were selected. Re-calculation of the embodied and operational carbon of the building after implementing the low carbon strategies and clean technology comparing to initial results show reductions in CO2 emissions by 22% creating a low carbon building. Therefore, this paper brings awareness and guidance globally to clients, building designers, and the government to design sustainably using suitable low carbon solutions in all construction projects, leading to a low carbon future.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 362
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review [J].
Anand, Chirjiv Kaur ;
Amor, Ben .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :408-416
[2]   FIRE DYNAMICS IN FACADE FIRE TESTS: Measurement, modeling and repeatability [J].
Anderson, Johan ;
Bostrom, Lars ;
Jansson, Robert ;
Milovanovic, Bojan .
APPLICATIONS OF STRUCTURAL FIRE ENGINEERING, 2017,
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 15978: 2011 Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method
[4]   Investigation of the temperature change and heat evolution of mortar incorporating PFA and metakaolin [J].
Bai, J ;
Wild, S .
CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2002, 24 (02) :201-209
[5]   The role of corner vortices in dictating peak wind loads on tilted flat solar panels mounted on large, flat roofs [J].
Banks, David .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2013, 123 :192-201
[6]  
Brakefield K., 2017, STEEL BLOG
[7]  
BSI, 2002, NA BS EN 1990 2002 U
[8]  
BSI, 2011, 7712011A12015 BSI
[9]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review [J].
Cabeza, Luisa F. ;
Rincon, Lidia ;
Vilarino, Virginia ;
Perez, Gabriel ;
Castell, Albert .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :394-416
[10]   Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: A review [J].
Cabeza, Luisa F. ;
Barreneche, Camila ;
Miro, Laia ;
Morera, Josep M. ;
Bartoli, Esther ;
Fernandez, A. Ines .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 23 :536-542