The Effects of Nonmagnetic Bolus on Contralateral Breast Skin Dose during Tangential Breast Irradiation Therapy

被引:1
作者
Won, Young-Jin [1 ]
Cho, Jae-Hwan [2 ]
Kim, Sung-chul [3 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Iisan Paik Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Iisan 10380, South Korea
[2] Ansan Coll, Dept Radiol Technol, Ansan 15518, South Korea
[3] Gachon Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Med Campus, Yeonsugu 21936, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
nonmagnetic bolus; breast dose; tangential breast therapy; IMPROVEMENT; CANCER; FIELD; IMRT;
D O I
10.4283/JMAG.2016.21.1.133
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study the contralateral breast skin dose was decreased. It was to apply the results to the clinical study after analysis of different radiation dose amounts to contralateral breast with nonmagnetic bolus and without nonmagnetic bolus. A Rando phantom was computed tomography (CT) simulated, five treatment plans were generated: open tangents, open field in field, wedge 15, wedge 30, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan with 50.4 Gy to cover sufficient breast tissue. Contralateral breast skin dose was measured at 8 points using a glass dosimeter. The average contralateral breast dose using nonmagnetic bolus showed better excellence in decreasing the absorbed dose in the order of 168 +/- 11.1 cGy, 131 +/- 10.2 cGy (29%), 112 +/- 9.7 cGy (49%), and 102 +/- 9.5 cGy (64%) than changing the treatment plan. This study focused on decreasing the effect of scattered dose by use of a nonmagnetic bolus on the contralateral breast during radiotherapy in breast cancer patients and an intriguingly significant decrease was observed parallel to the opposed beam.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 140
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Arun C., 2007, J CANCER RES THER, V3, P8
[2]   Is multibeam IMRT better than standard treatment for patients with left-sided breast cancer? [J].
Beckham, Wayne A. ;
Popescu, Carmen C. ;
Patenaude, Veronica V. ;
Wai, Elaine S. ;
Olivotto, Ivo A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03) :918-924
[3]   Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation [J].
Bhatnagar, AK ;
Brandner, E ;
Sonnik, D ;
Wu, A ;
Kalnicki, S ;
Deutsch, M ;
Heron, DE .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 96 (01) :41-46
[4]  
John D. B., 1992, NEW ENGL J MED, V326, P781
[5]   Improvement of Beam-Quality Evaluation Method for Medical Linear Accelerator Using Magnetic Field [J].
Kim, Jeongho ;
Han, Manseok ;
Yoo, Sejong ;
Kim, Kijin ;
Cho, Jae-Hwan .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS, 2015, 20 (02) :120-128
[6]   Efficiency Improvement of an Automotive Alternator by Heat Treatment [J].
Kim, Ji-Hyun ;
Hong, Jung-Pyo .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS, 2015, 20 (02) :155-160
[7]   A Study on Effective Source-Skin Distance using Phantom in Electron Beam Therapy [J].
Kim, Min-Tae ;
Lee, Hae-Kag ;
Heo, Yeong-Cheol ;
Cho, Jae-Hwan .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS, 2014, 19 (01) :15-19
[8]   The Basic Facts of Korean Breast Cancer in 2011: Results of a Nationwide Survey and Breast Cancer Registry Database [J].
Kim, Zisun ;
Mini, Sun Young ;
Yoon, Chan Seok ;
Lee, Hun Jae ;
Lee, Jung Sun ;
Youn, Hyun Jo ;
Park, Heung Kyu ;
Noh, Dong-Young ;
Hur, Min Hee .
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2014, 17 (02) :99-106
[9]  
Lah J. E., 2006, J KOREA ASS RAD PROT, V31, P181
[10]   Intensity modulation for breast treatment using static multi-leaf collimators [J].
Lo, YC ;
Yasuda, G ;
Fitzgerald, TJ ;
Urie, MM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (01) :187-194