Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: 5-Year Results Confirm Superior Overall Cosmesis

被引:162
作者
Mukesh, Mukesh B. [1 ]
Barnett, Gillian C. [1 ,2 ]
Wilkinson, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Moody, Anne M. [1 ]
Wilson, Charles [1 ]
Dorling, Leila
Hak, Charleen Chan Wah [2 ]
Qian, Wendi [1 ]
Twyman, Nicola [1 ]
Burnet, Neil G. [1 ,2 ]
Wishart, Gordon C. [3 ]
Coles, Charlotte E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[3] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
RADIATION-THERAPY; UK STANDARDIZATION; HYPOFRACTIONATION; IMRT;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2013.49.7842
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose There are few randomized controlled trial data to confirm that improved homogeneity with simple intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) decreases late breast tissue toxicity. The Cambridge Breast IMRT trial investigated this hypothesis, and the 5-year results are reported. Patients and Methods Standard tangential plans of 1,145 trial patients were analyzed; 815 patients had inhomogeneous plans ( 2 cm(3) receiving 107% of prescribed dose: 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks) and were randomly assigned to standard radiotherapy (RT) or replanned with simple IMRT; 330 patients with satisfactory dose homogeneity were treated with standard RT and underwent the same follow-up as the randomly assigned patients. Breast tissue toxicities were assessed at 5 years using validated methods: photographic assessment (overall cosmesis and breast shrinkage compared with baseline pre-RT photographs) and clinical assessment (telangiectasia, induration, edema, and pigmentation). Comparisons between different groups were analyzed using polychotomous logistic regression. Results On univariate analysis, compared with standard RT, fewer patients in the simple IMRT group developed suboptimal overall cosmesis (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.96; P = .027) and skin telangiectasia (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.92; P = .021). No evidence of difference was seen for breast shrinkage, breast edema, tumor bed induration, or pigmentation. The benefit of IMRT was maintained on multivariate analysis for both overall cosmesis (P = .038) and skin telangiectasia (P = .031). Conclusion Improved dose homogeneity with simple IMRT translates into superior overall cosmesis and reduces the risk of skin telangiectasia. These results are practice changing and should encourage centers still using two-dimensional RT to implement simple breast IMRT.
引用
收藏
页码:4488 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Fallowfield, L ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (06) :571-573
[2]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FORWARD-PLANNED INTENSITY MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER: INTERIM RESULTS AT 2 YEARS [J].
Barnett, Gillian C. ;
Wilkinson, Jennifer S. ;
Moody, Anne M. ;
Wilson, Charles B. ;
Twyman, Nicola ;
Wishart, Gordon C. ;
Burnet, Neil G. ;
Coles, Charlotte E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02) :715-723
[3]   A randomised controlled trial of forward-planned radiotherapy (IMRT) for early breast cancer: Baseline characteristics and dosimetry results [J].
Barnett, Gillian C. ;
Wilkinson, Jennifer ;
Moody, Anne M. ;
Wilson, Charles B. ;
Sharma, Ravi ;
Klager, Sabine ;
Hoole, Andrew C. F. ;
Twyman, Nicola ;
Burnet, Neil G. ;
Coles, Charlotte E. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 (01) :34-41
[4]  
Bentzen SM, 2008, LANCET, V371, P1098, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60348-7
[5]  
Bentzen SM, 2008, LANCET ONCOL, V9, P331, DOI [10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9, 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)60348-7]
[6]   Turning subjective into objective:: The BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment [J].
Cardoso, Maria Joao ;
Cardoso, Jaime ;
Amaral, Natalia ;
Azevedo, Isabel ;
Barreau, Lise ;
Bernardo, Mario ;
Christie, David ;
Costa, Susy ;
Fitzal, Florian ;
Fougo, Jose L. ;
Johansen, Jorgen ;
Macmillan, Douglas ;
Mano, Maria Piera ;
Regolo, Lea ;
Rosa, Jose ;
Teixeira, Luis ;
Vrieling, Conny .
BREAST, 2007, 16 (05) :456-461
[7]   Rational Use of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The Importance of Clinical Outcome [J].
De Neve, Wilfried ;
De Gersem, Werner ;
Madani, Indira .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) :40-49
[8]   Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy [J].
Donovan, Ellen ;
Bleakley, Natalie ;
Denholm, Erica ;
Evans, Phil ;
Gothard, Lone ;
Hanson, Jane ;
Peckitt, Clare ;
Reise, Stephanie ;
Ross, Gill ;
Sharp, Grace ;
Symonds-Tayler, Richard ;
Tait, Diana ;
Yarnold, John .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (03) :254-264
[9]   Dose-position and dose-volume histogram analysis of standard wedged and intensity modulated treatments in breast radiotherapy [J].
Donovan, EM ;
Bleackley, NJ ;
Evans, PM ;
Reise, SF ;
Yarnold, JR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (900) :967-973
[10]   Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials [J].
Darby S. ;
McGale P. ;
Correa C. ;
Taylor C. ;
Arriagada R. ;
Clarke M. ;
Cutter D. ;
Davies C. ;
Ewertz M. ;
Godwin J. ;
Gray R. ;
Pierce L. ;
Whelan T. ;
Wang Y. ;
Peto R. ;
Albain K. ;
Anderson S. ;
Barlow W. ;
Bergh J. ;
Bliss J. ;
Buyse M. ;
Cameron D. ;
Carrasco E. ;
Coates A. ;
Collins R. ;
Costantino J. ;
Cuzick J. ;
Davidson N. ;
Davies K. ;
Delmestri A. ;
Di Leo A. ;
Dowsett M. ;
Elphinstone P. ;
Evans V. ;
Gelber R. ;
Gettins L. ;
Geyer C. ;
Goldhirsch A. ;
Gregory C. ;
Hayes D. ;
Hill C. ;
Ingle J. ;
Jakesz R. ;
James S. ;
Kaufmann M. ;
Kerr A. ;
MacKinnon E. ;
McHugh T. ;
Norton L. ;
Ohashi Y. .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9804) :1707-1716