Erector spinae plane blocks for day-case medical thoracoscopy: a pilot clinical study

被引:8
作者
McPherson, Jamie [2 ]
Halvey, Edward [2 ]
Aujayeb, Avinash [1 ]
机构
[1] Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Resp Dept, Newcastle NE29 8NH, England
[2] Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Anaesthet Dept, Newcastle, England
关键词
erector spinae block; local anaesthetic thoracoscopy; medical thoracoscopy; nerve block; ANALGESIC-TECHNIQUE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1515/pp-2022-0115
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are a regional anaesthetic technique used for pain relief in thoracic procedures. Our centre has recently begun using ESP blocks pre-medical thoracoscopy for analgesia. Methods: Nine patients undergoing MT from September 2021 to February 2022 were included. Opioid use and depth of required sedation was recorded. Pre and post pain scores and at home were recorded by interview and review of charts. A functional pain questionnaire was administered via telephone. Results: Average greatest depth of sedation using propofol was 1.92 (standard error of mean [SEM] 0.27), with remifentanil 2.52 (SEM 0.46). 78% required oral analgesia on day 0 post discharge. 55% required oral analgesia on post-op day 1. Patients used an average of 3.33 mg oral morphine (SEM 2.35) in hospital, and 3 mg (SEM 2) on post-op day 1. Periprocedural pain scores were 0.66 (SEM 0.27). Pain scores in recovery were 1.56 (SEM 0.76). Pain scores 3-12 h post discharge were 3.56 (SEM 0.7), while pain scores on post-op day 1 were significantly higher at 5.56 (SEM 0.90) (Figure 1). Functional pain scoring showed patients doing activities of daily living well with a good ability to breathe and cough. All felt that their pain was well controlled on the day of the procedure and at home. No complications were reported. Conclusions: ESP blocks provide good analgesia. Pain scores showed significant analgesic effect lasting several hours. The project showed pain outcomes and patient acceptability were good for the use of regional anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 190
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Intracavitary anaesthesia for medical thoracoscopy procedural pain: the CAMP randomised trial [J].
Abdelhady, Ahmed Mohamed ;
Gadallah, Mohamed ;
Shaheen, Moustafa ;
Mourad, Sahar ;
Hassan, Maged .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY, 2021, 15 (01)
[2]   Efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral block for medical thoracoscopy [J].
Agnoletti, V. ;
Gurioli, C. ;
Piraccini, E. ;
Maitan, S. ;
Corso, R. Massimo ;
Matteo, B. ;
Poletti, V. ;
Gambale, G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (06) :916-917
[3]   THE ROLE OF MULTI-LEVEL INTERCOSTAL NERVE BLOCK IN LOCAL ANAESTHETIC THORACOSCOPY (LAT) [J].
Ajmal, S. ;
Walker, D. ;
Johnstone, S. ;
Caruana, E. ;
Tufail, M. ;
Panchal, R. K. .
THORAX, 2021, 76 :A174-A175
[4]   A review of a pleural service [J].
Aujayeb, A. ;
Parker, S. ;
Bourke, S. ;
Miller, J. ;
Cooper, D. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2016, 46 (01) :26-+
[5]  
Aujayeb A, 2021, J THORAC ONCOL, V16, pS812
[6]  
Aujayeb A, 2020, PLEURA PERITONEUM, V5, DOI [10.1515/pp-2020-0131, 10.1515/pap-2020-0131]
[7]   Erector Spinae Block a safe, simple and effective analgesic technique for major hepatobiliary surgery with thrombocytopenia [J].
Ayub, Arshad ;
Talawar, Praveen ;
Kumar, Rakesh ;
Bhoi, Debesh ;
Singh, Ajay Yadav .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 34 (04) :169-172
[8]   Local Anaesthetic (Medical) Thoracoscopy Services in the UK [J].
de Fonseka, Duneesha ;
Bhatnagar, Rahul ;
Maskell, Nick A. .
RESPIRATION, 2018, 96 (06) :560-563
[9]   PROSPECT guidelines for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations [J].
Feray, S. ;
Lubach, J. ;
Joshi, G. P. ;
Bonnet, F. ;
Van de Velde, M. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 (03) :311-325
[10]   The Erector Spinae Plane Block A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain [J].
Forero, Mauricio ;
Adhikary, Sanjib D. ;
Lopez, Hector ;
Tsui, Calvin ;
Chin, Ki Jinn .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (05) :621-627