Future studies in Iran development plans for wind power, a system dynamics modeling approach

被引:10
作者
Bamooeifard, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Malek Ashtar Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Wind power; Risk; Value; Share portfolio; Dynamic model; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
According to reports of Tavanir (power generation organization in Iran) in 2015, the share of wind power generation in Iran compared with other energy sources is less than 0.3%. In this paper, we suggest that despite the local potentials that exist in Iran, these capacities in wind power industry of Iran aren't correctly identified and used, also previous wind power functions have been weakened, all these because of the dynamic inhibitor loops as a result of policies conducted. Inhibitor loops are the results of short-term corrective measures which have brought dynamic risks and costs. These risks and costs make wind power energy sources unprofitable. In this study, using system dynamics approach, we analyze these costs paid for balance of risks and survey the optimal wind power production compared with other energy sources in energy portfolio. In the model used in this study, a dynamic relationship between risk and value is presented to create value in order to use energy sources efficiently and manage generated risks. Finally, the future process of value of wind power in energy portfolio is evaluated by computer simulation. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1064
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, RETHINKING EN REN EN
[2]   Analysis of renewable energy development to power generation in the United States [J].
Aslani, Alireza ;
Wong, Kau-Fui V. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 63 :153-161
[3]   Evaluation of renewable energy development in power generation in Finland [J].
Aslani, Alireza ;
Helo, Petri ;
Naaranoja, Marja .
JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 5 (06)
[4]   Business case uncertainty of power plants in future energy systems with wind power [J].
Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd ;
van den Broek, Machteld ;
Ozdemir, Ozge ;
Koutstaal, Paul ;
Faaij, Andre .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 89 :237-256
[5]  
Cottrell W.F., 1955, Energy and Society: The Relationship Between Energy, Social Change, and Economic Development
[6]   Review of factors affecting China's offshore wind power industry [J].
He, Zheng-Xia ;
Xu, Shi-Chun ;
Shen, Wen-Xing ;
Zhang, Hui ;
Long, Ru-Yin ;
Yang, He ;
Chen, Hong .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 :1372-1386
[7]   Wind power reliability valuation in a Hydro-Dominated power market: The Colombian case [J].
Isaza Cuervo, Felipe ;
Botero Botero, Sergio .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 57 :1359-1372
[8]   Portfolio theory application in wind potential assessment [J].
Medimorec, Diana ;
Tomsic, Zeljko .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 76 :494-502
[9]   Factors influencing calculation of capacity value of wind power: A case study of the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) [J].
Nguyen, Christy ;
Ma, Chunbo ;
Hailu, Atakelty ;
Chalak, Morteza .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 90 :319-328
[10]   System dynamics modelling of hybrid renewable energy systems and combined heating and power generator [J].
Reddi, Krishna R. ;
Li, Weilin ;
Wang, Bochao ;
Moon, Young .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2013, 6 (01) :31-47