PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system is superior in detecting transition zone prostate cancer: a diagnostic study

被引:14
作者
Wang, Zhibing [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Wenlu [1 ]
Shen, Junkang [1 ]
Jiang, Zhen [1 ]
Yang, Shuo [1 ]
Tan, Shuangxiu [1 ]
Zhang, Yueyue [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Huaian Hosp Huaian City, Dept Radiol, Huaian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnostic value; Transition zone; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PERIPHERAL ZONE; LESIONS; DIFFERENTIATION; HYPERPLASIA; PERFORMANCE; AGREEMENT; ACCURACY; FEATURES; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-020-02724-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The studies comparing the versions 2 vs. 2.1 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) are rare. This study aimed to evaluate whether PI-RADS version 2.1 is superior in detecting transition zone prostate cancer in comparison with PI-RADS version 2. Methods This was a diagnostic study of patients with prostate diseases who visited the Urology Department of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination between 03-01-2016 and 10-31-2018. The images originally analyzed using PI-RADS version 2 were retrospectively re-analyzed and scored in 2019 according to the updated PI-RADS version 2.1. The kappa and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used. Results For Reader 1, compared with PI-RADS version 2, version 2.1 had higher sensitivity (85% vs. 79%,P = 0.03), lower specificity (65% vs. 83%,P < 0.001), and lower area under the curve (AUC) (0.749 vs. 0.809,P < 0.001). For Reader 2 (first attempt), compared with PI-RADS version 2, version 2.1 had lower specificity (67% vs. 91%,P < 0.001) and lower AUC (0.702 vs. 0.844,P < 0.001). For Reader 2 (second attempt), compared with PI-RADS version 2, version 2.1 had higher sensitivity (88% vs. 78%,P < 0.001) and lower specificity (77% vs. 91%,P < 0.001). The kappa between the two attempts for Reader 2 was 0.321. Conclusion These results suggest that PI-RADS version 2.1 might improve the detection of prostate cancers in the transition zone compared with PI-RADS version 2 but that it might results in higher numbers of biopsies because of lower specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:4142 / 4149
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists [J].
Al-Maghrabi, Jaudah Ahmed ;
Bakshi, Nasir A. ;
Farsi, Hasan M. A. .
ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2013, 33 (01) :40-44
[2]  
American College of Radiology (ACR), 2015, PI RADS PROST IM REP
[3]   Editorial on "Head-to-Head Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer" [J].
An, Julie Y. ;
Fowler, Kathryn J. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) :587-588
[4]   Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results [J].
Auer, Thomas ;
Edlinger, Michael ;
Bektic, Jasmin ;
Nagele, Udo ;
Herrmann, Thomas ;
Schaefer, Georg ;
Aigner, Friedrich ;
Junker, Daniel .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (05) :687-693
[5]   Zonal location of prostate cancer: Significance for disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy? [J].
Augustin, H ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Blonski, J ;
Graefen, M ;
Palisaar, J ;
Daghofer, F ;
Huland, H ;
Erbersdobler, A .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (01) :79-85
[6]   Biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy: A comparison between prostate cancers located in different anatomical zones [J].
Augustin, H ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Graefen, M ;
Fernandez, S ;
Palisaar, J ;
Huland, H ;
Hammerer, P .
PROSTATE, 2003, 55 (01) :48-54
[7]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[8]   PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI [J].
Barrett, T. ;
Rajesh, A. ;
Rosenkrantz, A. B. ;
Choyke, P. L. ;
Turkbey, B. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) :841-852
[9]   Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: A systematic review of autopsy studies [J].
Bell, Katy J. L. ;
Del Mar, Chris ;
Wright, Gordon ;
Dickinson, James ;
Glasziou, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 137 (07) :1749-1757
[10]   Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience [J].
Byun, Jieun ;
Park, Kye Jin ;
Kim, Mi-hyun ;
Kim, Jeong Kon .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) :577-586