Readiness and Success of Ubiquitous Learning in Indonesia: Perspectives from the Implementation of a Pilot Project

被引:3
作者
Subiyakto, A'ang [1 ]
Hidayah, Nur Aeni [1 ]
Gusti, Gregoryo [1 ]
Hikami, Muhammad Ariful [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Islam Negeri UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Dept Informat Syst, South Tangerang 15412, Indonesia
关键词
ubiquitous learning; readiness and success; mixed methods; pilot project; Indonesia; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS SUCCESS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; HIGHER-EDUCATION; MCLEAN MODEL; MOBILE; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; COMMITMENT; MANAGEMENT; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/info10020079
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The implementation of ubiquitous learning (u-learning) is a good opportunity to address the affordability, accessibility, and quality issues of the higher education sector that are present in many countries. However, its broad application is still limited within the instructionist paradigm. Improving its implementation performance is a challenge for researchers and practitioners. This study aimed to understand the readiness and success status of u-learning implementation in Indonesia and to assess factors influencing the status based on stakeholder perspectives. A mixed methods inquiry with the sequential nested strategy was carried out by focusing on a quantitative analysis. The findings revealed that the readiness constructs influence u-learning performance. The study may contribute, theoretically and practically, to future studies, especially u-learning implementation studies, from the perspective of a developing country.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Achterkamp Marjolein C., 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.001
  • [2] Achterkamp M.C., 2013, Procedia Technology, V9, P167
  • [3] Afthanorhan W.M. A. B. W., 2013, International Journal of Engineering and Science Innovative Technologies, V2, P198, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1299441
  • [4] Ahlan A.R., 2015, TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control, V13, P686, DOI DOI 10.12928/telkomnika.v13i2.1323
  • [5] Acceptance and acceptability criteria: a literature review
    Alexandre, Boris
    Reynaud, Emanuelle
    Osiurak, Francois
    Navarro, Jordan
    [J]. COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2018, 20 (02) : 165 - 177
  • [6] Almajed AI, 2014, 2014 SCIENCE AND INFORMATION CONFERENCE (SAI), P984, DOI 10.1109/SAI.2014.6918305
  • [7] Anfara Jr V.A., 2014, Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, DOI DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, RES DESIGN QUALITATI