Assessing Sustainable Rural Development Based on Ecosystem Services Vulnerability

被引:34
|
作者
Fernandez Martinez, Pascual [1 ,2 ]
de Castro-Pardo, Monica [3 ]
Martin Barroso, Victor [1 ,2 ]
Azevedo, Joao C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Law & Social Sci, Dept Appl Econ 1, Campus Vicalvaro, Madrid 28933, Spain
[2] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Law & Social Sci, Hist & Econ Inst, Campus Vicalvaro, Madrid 28933, Spain
[3] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Law & Social Sci, Dept Business Econ, Campus Vicalvaro, Madrid 28933, Spain
[4] Inst Politecn Braganca, Ctr Invest Montanha, Campus Santa Apolonia, P-5300253 Braganca, Portugal
关键词
sustainable rural development; regional composite indicators; vulnerability; ecosystem services; goal programming; analytic hierarchy process; data envelopment analysis; Spain; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; INDEX; PLANTATIONS; RANKING;
D O I
10.3390/land9070222
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable Rural Development is essential to maintain active local communities and avoid depopulation and degradation of rural areas. Proper assessment of development in these territories is necessary to improve decision-making and to inform public policy, while ensuring biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services supply. Rural areas include high ecological value systems but the vulnerability of environmental components in development indicators has not been sufficiently pinpointed. The main objective of this work was to propose a new sustainable rural development composite indicator (nSRDI) while considering an environmental dimension indicator based on ecosystem services vulnerability and social and economic dimension indicators established using a sequentially Benefit of the Doubt-Data Envelopment Analysis (BoD-DEA) model. It aimed also to test effects of weighting methods on nSRDI. The composite indicator was applied to 10 regions (comarcas) in the Huesca province, Spain, producing a ranking of regions accordingly. The indicator was further tested through the analysis of the effect of an equal and optimum weighting method on scores and rankings of regions. Results showed substantial differences in nSRDI scores/rankings when vulnerability was added to the process, suggesting that the environmental dimension and the perspective from which it is conceived and applied matters when addressing sustainable rural development.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adapting to climate change: assessing the vulnerability of ecosystem services in Europe in the context of rural development
    John Tzilivakis
    D. J. Warner
    A. Green
    K. A. Lewis
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, 20 : 547 - 572
  • [2] Adapting to climate change: assessing the vulnerability of ecosystem services in Europe in the context of rural development
    Tzilivakis, John
    Warner, D. J.
    Green, A.
    Lewis, K. A.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2015, 20 (04) : 547 - 572
  • [3] Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Rural Development and Protected Areas
    de Castro-Pardo, Monica
    Azevedo, Joao C.
    Fernandez, Pascual
    LAND, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [4] Assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution to promote sustainable urban and rural development
    Collin, ML
    Melloul, AJ
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2003, 11 (07) : 727 - 736
  • [5] A simple method for assessing the vulnerability of wetland ecosystem services
    Stratford, Charlie J.
    Acreman, Mike C.
    Rees, H. Gwyn
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2011, 56 (08): : 1485 - 1500
  • [6] From sustainable development to ecosystem services
    Montes, C.
    ECOSISTEMAS, 2007, 16 (03): : 1 - 3
  • [7] Ecosystem governance of rural water ecosystem services under sustainable utilization
    Yang, Shujie
    WATER SUPPLY, 2023, 23 (09) : 3899 - 3911
  • [8] Thresholds for Rural Public and Ecosystem Services: Integration into Rural Green Space Spatial Planning for Sustainable Development
    Yang, Huiya
    Zou, Jiahui
    Wang, Chongxiao
    Wu, Renzhi
    Ali, Maroof
    Huang, Zhongde
    Jiang, Hongchao
    Zhang, Fan
    Bai, Yang
    LAND, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [9] Assessing and valuing peatland ecosystem services for sustainable management
    Reed, M. S.
    Bonn, A.
    Evans, C.
    Glenk, K.
    Hansjuergens, B.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 9 : 1 - 4
  • [10] A new framework for assessing ecosystem health with consideration of the sustainable supply of ecosystem services
    Huang, Ying
    Gan, Xiaoyu
    Feng, Yaofa
    Li, Jin
    Niu, Shaofei
    Zhou, Bo
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2024, 39 (02)