Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction

被引:39
作者
Ali, Sadeeq [1 ]
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan [1 ]
Mortaza, Niyousha [1 ]
Eshraghi, Arezoo [1 ]
Gholizadeh, Hossein [1 ]
Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Bin Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Biomed Engn, Fac Engn, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Pressure; Transtibial prostheses; Amputee; Satisfaction; Prosthetic liner; LOWER-LIMB AMPUTEES; PROSTHETIC SOCKET; SKIN PROBLEMS; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; PIN SUSPENSION; GEL LINER; ICEROSS; STUMP; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.06.004
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: The interface pressure between the residual limb and prosthetic socket has a significant effect on an amputee's satisfaction and comfort. Liners provide a comfortable interface by adding a soft cushion between the residual limb and the socket. The Dermo and the Seal-In X5 liner are two new interface systems and, due to their relative infancy, very little are known about their effect on patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to compare the interface pressure with these two liners and their effect on patient satisfaction. Methods: Nine unilateral transtibial amputees participated in the study. Two prostheses were fabricated for each amputee, one with the Seal-In liner and one with the Dermo liner. Interface pressure was measured at the anterior, posterior, medial and lateral regions during walking on the level ground. Each subject filled in a Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) regarding the satisfaction with the two liners. Findings: The mean peak pressures with the Seal-In liner was 34.0% higher at the anterior, 24.0% higher at the posterior and 7.0% higher at the medial regions of the socket (P=0.008. P=0.046. P=0.025) than it was with the Dermo Liner. There were no significant differences in the mean peak pressures between the two liners at the lateral regions. In addition, significant difference was found between the two liners both for satisfaction and problems (P < 0.05). Interpretation:There was less interface pressure between the socket and the residual limb with the Dermo liner. The results indicated that the Dermo liner provides more comfort in the socket than the Seal-In liner. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 948
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Åström I, 2004, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V28, P28
[2]   Skin problems of the stump and hand function in lower limb amputees: A historic cohort study [J].
Baars, E. C. T. ;
Dijkstra, P. U. ;
Geertzen, J. H. B. .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 32 (02) :179-185
[3]   Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses [J].
Baars, ECT ;
Geertzen, JHB .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 29 (01) :27-37
[4]   Comparison of interface pressures with pin and suction suspension systems [J].
Beil, TL ;
Street, GM .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 41 (6A) :821-828
[5]  
Buis AWP, 1997, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V21, P179
[6]  
CLUITMANS J, 1994, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V18, P78
[7]   Quantification of prosthetic outcomes: Elastomeric gel liner with locking pin suspension versus polyethylene foam liner with neoprene sleeve suspension [J].
Coleman, KL ;
Boone, DA ;
Laing, LS ;
Mathews, DE ;
Smith, DG .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 41 (04) :591-602
[8]  
Dietzen CJ., 1991, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, V3, P90, DOI 10.1097/00008526-199100320-00005
[9]   Ambulation monitoring of transtibial amputation subjects with patient activity monitor versus pedometer [J].
Dudek, Nancy L. ;
Khan, Omar D. ;
Lemaire, Edward D. ;
Marks, Meridith B. ;
Saville, Leyana .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 45 (04) :577-585
[10]   Skin problems in an amputee clinic [J].
Dudek, NL ;
Marks, MB ;
Marshall, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2006, 85 (05) :424-429