Magnetic resonance imaging at one year for detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma in children: Is it too early?

被引:20
|
作者
Lecler, A. [1 ,2 ]
Lenoir, M. [1 ]
Peron, J. [3 ]
Denoyelle, F. [4 ]
Garabedian, E. N. [4 ]
le Pointe, H. Ducou [1 ]
Nevoux, J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Hop Trousseau, AP HP, Serv Radiol Pediat, F-75012 Paris, France
[2] Fdn Adolphe De Rothschild, Serv Neuroradiol Diagnost, F-75019 Paris, France
[3] Ctr Anticanc Leon Berard, F-69008 Lyon, France
[4] Univ Paris 05, Hop Necker, AP HP, Serv Otorhinolaryngol Pediat, F-75015 Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris 11, Hop Bicetre, AP HP, Serv Otorhinolaryngol,INSERM U1185, F-94270 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
关键词
Residual cholesteatoma; MRI; DW imaging; Pediatric; TURBO SPIN-ECHO; MIDDLE-EAR; RISK-FACTORS; SINGLE-SHOT; PLANAR; DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.028
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the residual cholesteatoma detection accuracy of diffusion-weighted (DW) and T1 delayed sequences for magnetic resonance at one year postoperative with second-look surgery in pediatric patients who have undergone primary middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma. Methods: This was a prospective monocentric consecutive study conducted in a tertiary academic referral center. Children were referred for MR imaging (MRI) one year after surgery. A 1.5 T MRI was utilized, using nonecho-planar DW images and delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging was assessed by two radiologists before surgery. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were assessed using the it test. Magnetic resonance imaging data were compared with surgery, which was considered as the gold standard. Results: Twenty-four consecutive unselected pediatric patients were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the first observer were of 40%, 86%, 67%, and 67%, respectively, and those for the second observer were 30%, 86%, 60%, and 63%, respectively. The only two cholesteatoma with a size superior to 3 mm were diagnosed before surgery, but the majority of small cholesteatoma were not detected. Conclusions: MRI is a key examen to diagnosed the residual cholesteatoma but is limited by the size of the lesion under 3 mm. Delaying the realization of MRI during follow-up could increase sensitivity, thus avoiding misdiagnosis as well as unnecessary second look surgery. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1274
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Residual Cholesteatoma in Children and Benefit of Radiological Rereview
    Baudouin, Robin
    Simon, Francois
    Levy, Raphal
    Breton, Sylvain
    Alciato, Lauranne
    Talab, Elsa
    Leboulanger, Nicolas
    Couloigner, Vincent
    Garabedian, Erea-Noel
    Denoyelle, Francoise
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 169 (06) : 1631 - 1638
  • [2] Magnetic resonance imaging of cholesteatoma: an update
    Vercruysse, J. Ph
    De Foer, B.
    Somers, Th
    Casselman, J.
    Offeciers, E.
    B-ENT, 2009, 5 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [3] A Systematic Review of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Postoperative Cholesteatoma
    Jindal, Mudit
    Riskalla, Andrew
    Jiang, Dan
    Connor, Steve
    O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2011, 32 (08) : 1243 - 1249
  • [4] Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    De Foer, Bert
    Vercruysse, Jean-Philippe
    Bernaerts, Anja
    Deckers, Filip
    Pouillon, Marc
    Somers, Thomas
    Casselman, Jan
    Offeciers, Erwin
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (04) : 513 - 517
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bazzi, Khalil
    Wong, Eugene
    Jufas, Nicholas
    Patel, Nirmal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 118 : 90 - 96
  • [6] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the management of cholesteatoma
    Jindal, Mudit
    Doshi, Jayesh
    Srivastav, Manoj
    Wilcock, David
    Irving, Richard
    De, Ranit
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 267 (02) : 181 - 185
  • [7] Value of T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cholesteatoma Detection
    Fukuda, Atsushi
    Morita, Shinya
    Harada, Taisuke
    Fujiwara, Keishi
    Hoshino, Kimiko
    Nakamaru, Yuji
    Homma, Akihiro
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (10) : 1440 - 1444
  • [8] Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma: Analysis of a series of 97 cases
    Akkari, M.
    Gabrillargues, J.
    Saroul, N.
    Pereira, B.
    Russier, M.
    Mom, T.
    Gilain, L.
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2014, 131 (03) : 153 - 158
  • [9] The value of non echo planar, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of residual or recurrent middle-ear cholesteatoma
    Velthuis, S.
    Van Everdingen, K. J.
    Quak, J. J.
    Colnot, D. R.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2014, 128 (07) : 599 - 603
  • [10] Postoperative Non-Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes After Cholesteatoma Surgery: Implications for Cholesteatoma Screening
    Dhepnorrarat, Rataphol Chris
    Wood, Bradley
    Rajan, Gunesh P.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) : 54 - 58